(Oldest Posts First) - Go To The Latest Post
I say not far enough, lets pay people to actually go to the matches. :).
royaldunne (Meath) - Posts: 19449 - 13/09/2016 14:15:24 1913644 Link 0 |
The only people sky employ in Ireland is people to collect the subscriptions the make no programmes here, the fly in camera crews in to cover the games. Something like half of the tv commerical revenue generated goes to channels not based in ireland. The same people who support the sky deal will be complaining about the ouput from rte, tv3 or tg4.
ros1 (Roscommon) - Posts: 1211 - 13/09/2016 16:28:55 1913747 Link 1 |
If everyone takes your attitude then no one is going to train the underage, been on the finance committees, line the pitch, collect on the gate, do unpire, wash the Jerseys etc unless the get paid and then what would happen clubs who already struggling would not be able to pay these people and would fold which would turn alot of people away from the game reducting ticket sales and donations.
ros1 (Roscommon) - Posts: 1211 - 13/09/2016 16:37:55 1913754 Link 2 |
The only reason sky are interested in the gaa is to keep there irish subscriptions in the summer months the have no interest in showing the league when the premier league and euro rugby is on. Putting the league on sky would be a disaster for it, when you see championship games only getting 7 thousand people on sky no one would see the games.
ros1 (Roscommon) - Posts: 1211 - 13/09/2016 16:49:15 1913761 Link 1 |
They charge an admission fee to attend matches which is no different than a subscription channel charging people to watch the games on it.It really isn't any different but of course some people just want to ignore that because it doesn't suit their argument.
uibhfhaili1986 (Offaly) - Posts: 1296 - 13/09/2016 16:49:58 1913762 Link 0 |
Well it's far from exactly the same. When you attend a game you pay for one game. The only way to watch an exclusive to sky is to own a sky package which is a much larger marginal expense. It's why people are more likely to get priced out. I think it's also frustrating that the GAA are helping to contribute to the fragmentation that's going on in the television market. It's next to impossible to watch every tv show you want to at a reasonable price with so many different platforms with their own exclusive content. I can understand someone who's getting priced out of their other TVs to be pretty pissed off that even their GAA viewing is now getting fragmented adding a further expense. The TV industry is looking to squeeze everything out of the population and now the GAA is in bed with them. Whammo86 (Antrim) - Posts: 4232 - 13/09/2016 17:11:20 1913776 Link 1 |
Well said.
royaldunne (Meath) - Posts: 19449 - 13/09/2016 17:29:45 1913784 Link 0 |
Not really. Attending a game and watching it on TV are two very different experiences so you cant really compare the two. I will say again, Sky deal in my opinion had nothing whatsoever to do with increased exposure or so called superior coverage or any of those red herrings. To be honest id say the Sky gurus are probably as shocked as anyone to hear people like ye defending them. joncarter (Galway) - Posts: 2692 - 13/09/2016 18:18:11 1913804 Link 1 |
Attending a game and watching it on TV are two very different experiences so you know as well as i do that you cant compare the two, but you will because it "suits your argument".
joncarter (Galway) - Posts: 2692 - 13/09/2016 18:20:02 1913805 Link 1 |
There is a admission fee to many events which are shown on free to air tv. This post is about tv rights not admissions prices
ros1 (Roscommon) - Posts: 1211 - 13/09/2016 18:27:00 1913810 Link 1 |
As Bruce the boss was sang, 57 channels and nothing on.
royaldunne (Meath) - Posts: 19449 - 13/09/2016 18:31:29 1913814 Link 0 |
I think its fairly telling that seven pages in and the supporters of the sky deal are unable to come up with one advantage of the deal. Alot of people can't admit the were wrong 3 years ago ros1 (Roscommon) - Posts: 1211 - 13/09/2016 18:32:13 1913815 Link 1 |
They charge an admission fee to attend matches which is no different than a subscription channel charging people to watch the games on it.It really isn't any different but of course some people just want to ignore that because it doesn't suit their argument. MesAmis (Dublin) - Posts: 13717 - 13/09/2016 18:39:43 1913821 Link 0 |
I just checked Sky's website and it now only €20 per month to add Sky sports to your package. Pretty good value in fairness and around the same price as a championship ticket and you get to see a lot more than just 70 minutes of action. Attending live sport is atrocious bad value for money , Sky is ten times better value for money if you are even only half interested in sport. uibhfhaili1986 (Offaly) - Posts: 1296 - 13/09/2016 18:58:39 1913840 Link 0 |
Fair point. 20 euro per month is hardly penal. joncarter (Galway) - Posts: 2692 - 13/09/2016 19:49:10 1913871 Link 1 |
Just checked it there. Sky offered a deal to UPC customers, which involved spending 1 euro a month for 6 months (pretty good, eh?), after 6 months it goes up to 37.50 from then on. joncarter (Galway) - Posts: 2692 - 13/09/2016 19:56:55 1913876 Link 0 |
Like majority in my area I have sky, have it for about 15 years now, the basic sky package is €38 pm , I get sky full package, including all movie channels, on demand, cinema , all sports channels, including F1 channel, (second sport love) for €68 per month. I find it extremely good value works out about 2.20 a day, the kids get all the Disney films etc all included. Couldn't ask for more. I dont see it as a extra cost I see it as great value for money for what you getting,
royaldunne (Meath) - Posts: 19449 - 13/09/2016 20:12:03 1913890 Link 0 |
Even taking €20 as the price (that's more than it was costing me at the time I cancelled my sky sports). You're talking about €240 a year, mainly qualifier game that cost a 1 time cost of €15 say. So no it's certainly not the same. People can justify committing the odd €15 quid to a game, get out of the house see some friendly faces. Committing €240 for GAA sports and whatever other sh1te they have is a different matter. You may only care about 3 of the 14 exclusive games but you're stuck paying for them all. Value for money is different for different people, there are plenty of people who literally cannot afford that extra expense a year. Whammo86 (Antrim) - Posts: 4232 - 13/09/2016 20:21:12 1913894 Link 0 |
But is attending a match value for money? Taking all into consideration, is the season ticket value for money?
royaldunne (Meath) - Posts: 19449 - 13/09/2016 20:32:59 1913904 Link 0 |
How are you getting it son cheap? I think I'm paying over €100 per month for the same thing.
uibhfhaili1986 (Offaly) - Posts: 1296 - 13/09/2016 20:43:30 1913909 Link 0 |