(Oldest Posts First)
I was just wondering would any of you be in favour of a trial on long range points being rewarded with an extra score. (2 points instead of 1) boomerang (Mayo) - Posts: 49 - 19/10/2015 16:01:50 1800260 Link 0 |
Way crazier ideas than that. Like a basketball 3 pointer. Could make a great finish to a game. A pointer for a draw, outside the 45 for the 2 points and a win. GreenandRed (Mayo) - Posts: 7343 - 19/10/2015 16:13:23 1800262 Link 0 |
not a bad idea but a point from deep in the corner is just as good if not better than one from 45 out. It could also see the end of crazy goal rushes at the end of a game when a team is down by one DoireCityFC (Derry) - Posts: 1580 - 19/10/2015 16:29:33 1800273 Link 0 |
Interesting idea but may be tricky for a referee to police. Look how many incorrect calls are made regarding penalties where the foul is close to the edge of the square. roundball (Tipperary) - Posts: 2514 - 19/10/2015 16:57:45 1800289 Link 0 |
nah there would be too many hail mary efforts when better options are inside and yes it would just be another thing to get right for referees and umpires. SaffronDon (Antrim) - Posts: 2385 - 19/10/2015 17:50:24 1800314 Link 0 |
good idea. At county level you would need a ref in both halves off the pitch. This could help keep tabs on off the ball fouling & police the idea of shooting from long range. Surely a 25 m radius white line could be lined onto the pitch at each end to outline the scoring area which determines if 2 points is applicable. The way that county level has progressed & the speed etc that it is played at, it only makes sense to have 2 match officials in my opinion. Would take the pressure off one official to keep up with & make all the hard calls in a split second. just_the_facts (Cavan) - Posts: 163 - 19/10/2015 20:39:38 1800390 Link 0 |