(Oldest Posts First) - Go To The Latest Post
Think it's a bit strong calling it an act of vilonce, that aside excellent post couldn't agree more more lads n lassies need to lose the county glasses or this site is dead
Damothedub (Dublin) - Posts: 5193 - 18/07/2016 20:17:36 1885845 Link 0 |
Exactly,it's a whingers paradise this forum.He deserved a yellow and he got one.
Dubh_linn (Dublin) - Posts: 2312 - 18/07/2016 20:22:41 1885854 Link 0 |
Yeh it's a black card all right deliberate pull down same as SoS got in AISF. Whatever about the merits of the card yesterday I think the black card should only be for pull down disrupting play theduke66 (Dublin) - Posts: 334 - 18/07/2016 20:29:20 1885856 Link 0 |
Often when a player from your home county,or a close rival, is involved in a controversial incident like this, it can be difficult to remain unbiased while arriving at a fair and balanced conclusion. extranjero (Wexford) - Posts: 375 - 18/07/2016 21:49:47 1885909 Link 0 |
Good man. I note 'provocative gesture' in the black card list but yet I haven't seen you calling out the ref for not giving Dolan a black. Yet you've been whinging about Connolly throughout the thread. Why is that? Because Dolan is not a Dub?
Joxer (Dublin) - Posts: 4700 - 19/07/2016 00:31:25 1885976 Link 0 |
For all the talk of Connolly being targeted, let's not forget that what precipitated the entire incident was getting his hair ruffled! Mildly irritating and somewhat childish, but his reaction was ridiculous. ballydalane (Kilkenny) - Posts: 1246 - 19/07/2016 00:41:01 1885978 Link 0 |
Where's all the uproar about this? Far worse than the Connolly incident. CroiGorm (Dublin) - Posts: 1547 - 19/07/2016 08:30:05 1886008 Link 1 |
The Westmeath man shouldn't have touched Connolly, he instigated the incident and got what he deserved. geoff (Tyrone) - Posts: 377 - 19/07/2016 08:37:58 1886011 Link 1 |
I think the problem with "debate" on this forum is people neither read or aware of what has already been said and they are rather late to the debate! By page six the same conclusions have been recycled ad nauseum, conclusions that were arrived in consensus by the first ten or so posts. If people are going to make sweeping statements about their own county posters they should at least show them the courtesy of reading what has already been posted the "johnny come latelys" might be surprised that it has already been stated. To the point in hand Jim Gavin won't drop Connolly simply because he is a gifted footballer - warts an all. A coach will put up with his "dark" side because when he fires he fires well. As was said ages ago, he was poor on the field, should have been subbed, he was been wound up, playing badly and a firework likely to go off, that is when Gavin will cut his losses as would any good coach. But being all moralistic - leave that to the real county fans. arock (Dublin) - Posts: 4898 - 19/07/2016 08:57:39 1886015 Link 0 |
Connolly has had his say on the matter: CroiGorm (Dublin) - Posts: 1547 - 19/07/2016 15:55:00 1886426 Link 0 |
Surely this thread should be on the Dublin page no? Liamwalkinstown (Dublin) - Posts: 8166 - 19/07/2016 16:07:20 1886434 Link 0 |
that was the one incident you saw sure he was getting it off the ball throughout the game hill16no1man (Dublin) - Posts: 12665 - 19/07/2016 20:56:46 1886647 Link 0 |