(Oldest Posts First) - Go To The Latest Post
ormondbannerman cavanman47 (Cavan) - Posts: 5017 - 04/07/2015 19:39:08 1747479 Link 0 |
Honestly I think the ref (who i have praised on other occasions to my friends as being one of the best around) got it wrong. Play had moved on substantially from the incident. All officials are miked up these days including the 4th official and at least one of umpires at either goal. There can be no miscommunication under these circumstances. Therefore it has to be assumed that the incident was drawn to the ref's attention immediately. That being so it can be argued he ignored the advice given by playing on. The incident had past and any action thereon moves to the CCC to adjudicate on the offence. It appears that over the half time cup of tea the officials have consulted each other and then agreed to retrospectively issue the red card. This is wrong. This is not in the rules or is it? anduna (Down) - Posts: 210 - 04/07/2015 19:40:11 1747481 Link 0 |
First off, it was a red card offence no doubt. However, I have a problem with how it was dealt with. There has been uproar before about refs seeing big screen replays and changin their minds - who is to say the red did not see a replay at half time. Why was it not brought to his attention immediately? I am uncomfortable with how it transpired. benjyyy (Donegal) - Posts: 1422 - 04/07/2015 19:48:58 1747484 Link 0 |
Yes Ben cavan were robbed. MY god ben stick to winning streak son. Football is not your thing MartinGerard (Longford) - Posts: 275 - 04/07/2015 20:17:15 1747497 Link 0 |
Monaghan v Tyrone in 2013 quarter final the Ref sent off Penrose for an incident that happened at the half time whistle so there is precedent for this. muckla (UK) - Posts: 366 - 04/07/2015 20:25:52 1747502 Link 0 |
ormondbannerman Naysayer (Antrim) - Posts: 2071 - 04/07/2015 20:29:40 1747503 Link 0 |
Martin - you may go to a few comprehension classes because I didn't say anything of the sort. But I'll clarify just for you - Ros were very worthy winners. benjyyy (Donegal) - Posts: 1422 - 04/07/2015 20:34:10 1747505 Link 0 |
Offside_Rule (Antrim) - Posts: 4058 - 04/07/2015 20:36:45 1747506 Link 0 |
And why did they wait til half time when they are wired up? Just doesn't sit right with me. Offside_Rule (Antrim) - Posts: 4058 - 04/07/2015 20:37:45 1747507 Link 0 |
MartinGerard (Longford) - Posts: 275 - 04/07/2015 20:47:05 1747512 Link 0 |
The same happened in the 2013 fermanagh v cavan match. No cavan fans complained that night when sean quigley sent off before second half started for an incident that happened prior to the break!!! Molaise (Fermanagh) - Posts: 96 - 04/07/2015 21:01:28 1747521 Link 0 |
Molaise - again different circumstances. That was a mass brawl after the half time whistle had gone. Offside_Rule (Antrim) - Posts: 4058 - 04/07/2015 21:24:07 1747545 Link 0 |
Offside_Rule muckla (UK) - Posts: 366 - 04/07/2015 21:24:43 1747546 Link 0 |
Red card , no complaints . Don't really know what exactly was going on - Umpires definitely saw the incident - were trying to bring it to attention of referee but for some reason couldn't draw his attention while the game was on . Maybe it was a problem with the mic - looked that way anyway . They were having a good chat with him coming off the field at half time and some of the Roscommon players were throwing their two cents worth in as well . From the referees body language he looked to be saying - don't worry , it'll be sorted after the break ! I was of no doubt there would be a red card issued after the break as were a good few around me . Hardtimes (Cavan) - Posts: 1056 - 04/07/2015 21:34:17 1747551 Link 0 |
The whistle had already went for half time that day Molaise. gotmilk (Fermanagh) - Posts: 4971 - 04/07/2015 21:36:26 1747552 Link 0 |
Molaise s goldrick (Cavan) - Posts: 5518 - 04/07/2015 21:48:01 1747560 Link 0 |
Muckla - because the incident today didn't happen at the half time whistle. And it does matter as it's a decision by the officials. How toothless a team were etc is irrelevant to the discussion. Offside_Rule (Antrim) - Posts: 4058 - 04/07/2015 21:51:04 1747562 Link 0 |
Until a referee receives the substitution slip a player is deemed to be still on the field of play. The referee was totally correct in what he did. There is no place for striking out in our games. We waited long enough for halk eye to correct scores so if video or TV evidence plays a part like it did yesterday I'm all for it. Poor cowardly tactics by the Cavan management in trying to replace Corr at half time. Seemingly the can't get their tactics right on or off the field. Well done ref. Awwwwnow (Cavan) - Posts: 1050 - 05/07/2015 09:27:24 1747581 Link 0 |
Clutching at straws if there is an issue with the way the red card was administered it will be found out. Looked fine to me and Cavan tried to pre-empt the inevitable by trying to sub the guy. Officials done well at the match and they done the right thing and surely that is all that matters, surely none of us would want a player to stay on that struck another? arock (Dublin) - Posts: 4898 - 05/07/2015 10:11:47 1747591 Link 0 |
Substitution had not taken place so ref was correct, excellent decision in fact. MadgeKing (Cavan) - Posts: 493 - 05/07/2015 10:22:56 1747598 Link 0 |