(Oldest Posts First) - Go To The Latest Post
There seems to be consensus on part of the problem being that current rules aren't implemented. I'd agree with that. I'd also agree that the linesmen and umpires need to do more. How often do you seen a punch thrown in front of an umpire whilst he remains standing with hands by his sides and ignores it. tyroneed (Tyrone) - Posts: 753 - 13/03/2015 18:05:04 1702393 Link 0 |
Leave the rules alone. Leave the game alone. We had really great championship matches last year. Last weekend all of the talk was about Dublin v Tyrone and to a lesser extent Donegal v Monaghan. Down played Galway in a game that finished 1-17 to 1-16 yet there wasn't so much as a word about it. It's not the rules that need to be changed. It's the mind sets that need to be changed. Greengrass (Louth) - Posts: 6031 - 13/03/2015 18:38:24 1702397 Link 0 |
The biggest problem with the modern game is that too many teams are flooding their defence. You need a disincentive to stop this behaviour. A very simple way would to award a free in from the 14 if a team doesn't make a tackle on the opposition within a defined period say 3 seconds. Teams would have to go back to man to man. A team putting 15 men behind the ball would run the risk of the opposition kicking long passes back and getting an easy score. MB1 (Tyrone) - Posts: 360 - 13/03/2015 18:52:51 1702399 Link 0 |
In lieu of limiting consecutive hand passes, I'd have 'no handpass, or kick only zones', say between each 45 and 65. So handpasses would be allowed unlimited at both ends of the pitch (behind/beyond each 45) and in the middle of the pitch. omahant (USA) - Posts: 2632 - 13/03/2015 18:59:30 1702402 Link 0 |
Tackling is a huge problem as is time wasting. Its absolutely baffling when players both legitimately and illegitimately go down injured and the clock keeps ticking on. An injury then lasts 4 minutes or so and the added time at the end of the half is 2 minutes. Stuff like that makes it hard to take those charged with the future of the game serious. Its a simple solution, if a player goes down injured and requires attention the referee simply stops the clock. All teams use this to tactical advantage when ahead and i'm sure the ball in play/ball out of play ratio significantly reduces as the game nears the end. seany16 (Dublin) - Posts: 1658 - 13/03/2015 19:28:16 1702408 Link 0 |
Handpassing isn't a problem in the game it is as a result of the problem which is the blanket defence as kick passes are very easy to intercept when a ball has to be kicked into a defence with 12 or 13 men inside the 45.Hanpassing at speed is the only effective way to beat the blanket defence .Long range point kicking won't beat it because it is extremely difficult to execute under the high pressure of intercounty football where you have almost no time on the ball and have to shoot quickly and scores from past the 45 were always a fairly rare occurence. uibhfhaili1986 (Offaly) - Posts: 1296 - 14/03/2015 08:56:20 1702448 Link 0 |
Thomas Clarke, great post, for any of the luddites who keep crying "stop changing the game, there's nothing wrong with it, etc." HighKing81 (Meath) - Posts: 129 - 14/03/2015 09:39:11 1702454 Link 0 |
So a 'tweak' is not a change. Interesting. I tweaked my boxers this morning. Or did I change them? They are still boxers, just cleaner but not the same as I had yesterday. Talk about semantics. Offside_Rule (Antrim) - Posts: 4058 - 14/03/2015 10:23:21 1702462 Link 0 |
Offside_Rule uibhfhaili1986 (Offaly) - Posts: 1296 - 14/03/2015 11:05:29 1702468 Link 0 |
13 a side will not work , it's a stupid idea IMO. TheRightStuff (Donegal) - Posts: 1688 - 14/03/2015 11:16:58 1702474 Link 0 |
13-a-side favours the lads with greater speed and fitness, and reduces the impact players like Seamus Quigley and other bigger, slower but skillful men can have on the game so I think would be a terrible move. Teams would still play with blanket defences, except they would need make do with 12 men back instead of 14. Soma (UK) - Posts: 2630 - 14/03/2015 11:32:44 1702478 Link 0 |
The rule change I actually proposed in the Football Review Committee's survey was moving the ball forward 30m instead of 13m for delaying quick frees, in fact further would be better. It's the ultimate in cynicism in my view and to be honest for the sake of 13m I'll do it myself unless it'll bring a free within scoring range. roundball (Tipperary) - Posts: 2514 - 14/03/2015 11:53:31 1702485 Link 0 |
Yes 13 aside will just result in 11 bodies behind the ball . Most sports are way too conservative in brining changes , look how long it took the billion pound premier league to ring changes with the goal line technology . The GAA will probably not undergo a reformation however a few alterations would be nice . TheRightStuff (Donegal) - Posts: 1688 - 14/03/2015 12:13:33 1702491 Link 0 |
Play every game with 2 referees IamADragon (Cavan) - Posts: 305 - 14/03/2015 12:49:00 1702496 Link 0 |
Agree with roundball. HighKing81 (Meath) - Posts: 129 - 14/03/2015 16:57:55 1702563 Link 0 |