(Oldest Posts First) - Go To The Latest Post
Yes your right The Flaker no place for Donacha Walsh trying to get Keegan sent off aswell and I'll repeat may self again no place for diving or play acting clondalkindub (Dublin) - Posts: 9926 - 29/08/2014 12:35:32 1644015 Link 0 |
While the red was soft it was technically a red. westkerry (Kerry) - Posts: 1250 - 29/08/2014 12:36:14 1644018 Link 0 |
westkerry realdub (Dublin) - Posts: 8597 - 29/08/2014 12:41:59 1644026 Link 0 |
It was minimal but what are rules for if not implemented. This is the equivalent to breaking the speed limit by a few kph and getting done for it. It's frustrating when others speed by you travelling much faster and yet are not caught. But at the same time the guard was still right to fine you as you broke the rules. Somewhere the driver must accept responsibility for his actions. seany16 (Dublin) - Posts: 1658 - 29/08/2014 12:49:41 1644039 Link 0 |
Realdub - if you saw his treatment off the ball ( not against Dublin I'll add ) westkerry (Kerry) - Posts: 1250 - 29/08/2014 12:50:34 1644042 Link 0 |
Aido my point is pretty obvious if you care to read my posts on this subject.It was a ridiculous red card,and those who supported it were wrong.Great news that common sense has prevailed.A trait sadly lacking in a lot of posters im afraid. cuederocket (Dublin) - Posts: 5084 - 29/08/2014 12:52:16 1644044 Link 0 |
It's tough on the ref but only fair on Lee Keegan. Parkinson made a good point on OffTheBall that if all rules were properly implemented everyone would go apesh*t - 4 steps rule never implemented, if every player 'contributing to a melee' was sent off Armagh v Donegal would have been 5 a side, keepers in hurling take puc outs outside the small square 9 times out of 10 and it isn't called up etc. I'm not saying all rules aren't implemented but a lot don't go exactly by the book, and the 'minimal force' one is the same. I feel bad for Coldrick but it's only fair on Lee, and I though Coldrick had a bad game even without the red card tbh. CaisleanCnucha (Dublin) - Posts: 1379 - 29/08/2014 12:52:27 1644046 Link 0 |
clondalkindub WildPundit (Tipperary) - Posts: 1709 - 29/08/2014 12:54:55 1644048 Link 0 |
westkerry realdub (Dublin) - Posts: 8597 - 29/08/2014 12:59:51 1644052 Link 0 |
We are a laughing stock. Firstly, a player is rightly red carded even though it is on the very minor end of the scale. Why is he red carded? because it is in the rules to either strike or attempt to strike. The ref put down he struck out on the match report as opposed to attempting to strike. The mayo county board climbed all over this dependency, to get their player off. They won the case. Donegalman (None) - Posts: 3830 - 29/08/2014 13:07:28 1644059 Link 0 |
dermo connolly got off a few years ago too. Who'd be a ref? lowballplease (Galway) - Posts: 935 - 29/08/2014 13:10:43 1644063 Link 0 |
Also when is horan naming his dummy team ? KingdomBoy1 (Kerry) - Posts: 14092 - 29/08/2014 13:19:03 1644077 Link 0 |
cuederocket Aido69 (Dublin) - Posts: 381 - 29/08/2014 13:22:00 1644080 Link 0 |
cuederocket ExiledinDublin (Mayo) - Posts: 131 - 29/08/2014 13:25:38 1644084 Link 0 |
Hey ban,since you seem to be an avid rules man,strictly to the letter of the law,how bout you come up with a PERFECT solution yourself.Anything you come up with,that doesnt see similiar non incidents such as this,end up as a red card,is good with me.As a Dublin taxi driver im busy ferrying around some of our 30000 American guests for the game tomorrow.Id be embareased to show them a clip of Lee Keegans sending off. cuederocket (Dublin) - Posts: 5084 - 29/08/2014 13:28:33 1644085 Link 0 |
Exileindublin,so your saying now that the referee thought there was contact and after further reflection,decided there was no contact.This is what ive been saying since the non incident happened.Nothing happened.It was a pathetic red card.How others believed it merited a red card i cant understand.And please dont go on about the technacality of some obscure rule.Nothing will change my mind on the matter.It was the softest red card ive ever had the mispleasure to witness. cuederocket (Dublin) - Posts: 5084 - 29/08/2014 13:35:02 1644090 Link 0 |
the ref was right to send him off. to strike or attempt to strike is a sending off. it dosn't matter that he is a good lad/not a dirty player/goaded into it/ shaking a fly off his boot whatever. he deserved to be sent off. i was impressed with the referee. he could have wrote in his report that he sent him off for attempting to strike. but he put in his report what he thought he saw "keegan kicking an opponent" he could have easily looked at da game after and said he sent him off for attempting to strike. Mayo just used the rules to get keegan off. every county and club would do the same in this position. ironman (Mayo) - Posts: 131 - 29/08/2014 13:56:01 1644116 Link 0 |
Donegalman and lowballplease KingdomBoy1 (Kerry) - Posts: 14092 - 29/08/2014 14:11:55 1644133 Link 0 |
KingdomBoy - Horan just named his dummy team for this week there at lunch time - hope the few tricks he pulls this week work just as well as the two lads who started last weekend!! Surely time to put fines in place for that carry on. blacknamber (Kerry) - Posts: 267 - 29/08/2014 14:13:24 1644135 Link 0 |
It was a red card offence, regardless whether Keegan attempted or deliberately kicked out. Makes it hard for referees to make a call in big games. Why do these decisions always seem to happen in games involving big teams,(cards rescinded) or are the rules applied differently for the smaller counties? thelongridge (Offaly) - Posts: 1747 - 29/08/2014 14:24:16 1644144 Link 0 |