(Oldest Posts First) - Go To The Latest Post
Thanks, Malonemagic for your reply. I disagree with your maths. tommy58 (Dublin) - Posts: 169 - 25/07/2014 20:37:30 1626005 Link 0 |
It's a shame provincial grounds don't get more games. Championship Sunday's are great. An Ulsterman, who was a former GAA president, had a good call in fairness about provincial groups. It's the best way to promote the game as well. Guarantee each county at least two home group games in April and May before heading into the knockout stages. legendzxix (Kerry) - Posts: 7857 - 25/07/2014 21:01:11 1626009 Link 0 |
tommy 58 , you're still wrong because you keep omitting the provincial semi-final and provincial final ( that the provincial champs have to win ). Provincial champs have to win 5 matches , not the 3 you referred to . By the time they have won the provincial final , the beaten quarter finalists have won 3 back door games . Malonemagic (Laois) - Posts: 766 - 25/07/2014 21:28:07 1626020 Link 0 |
Assuming all matches are 50/50 tommy58 (Dublin) - Posts: 169 - 25/07/2014 22:01:28 1626033 Link 0 |
After a few years of provincial champions having a poor record in quarter-finals. It has turned around in previous years. legendzxix (Kerry) - Posts: 7857 - 26/07/2014 09:46:42 1626041 Link 0 |
To Malonemagic - omahant (USA) - Posts: 2598 - 26/07/2014 14:13:09 1626122 Link 0 |
Well if a champions round is a step in one direction, a Round of 16 is a step in the other direction. It'll replace qualifier rounds 3 and 4. Simply draw provincial winners at home against the 4 lowest Q2 winners based on league placing. Draw provincial runners-up against the 4 highest Q2 winners based on league placing with a separate draw for home tie. legendzxix (Kerry) - Posts: 7857 - 26/07/2014 14:48:34 1626137 Link 0 |
Omahant what are you and Tommy smoking. You just said in your post that provincial champs need to win 3 games from quarter finals on. But sure a losing provincial quarter finalist only has three games from that stage too. You cannot compare there odds without counting all the games both must play. I'll give you an example. Dublin beat laois in Leinster quarter final. Dublin went on to win leinster. But you cannot ignore that they had to beat wexford and meath when calculating odds. Malonemagic (Laois) - Posts: 766 - 26/07/2014 15:56:23 1626153 Link 0 |
In effect what Tommy might as well say is that all Ireland finalists are more likely to win all Ireland , as he's dismissing the games required to get there. To do an equal comparison of the odds of Dublin s odds going the direct route via laois going indirectly, it has to be calculated at the time dublin beat laois. Or let's just agree with Tommy and say all Ireland finalists are more likely to win all Ireland! ! Malonemagic (Laois) - Posts: 766 - 26/07/2014 16:07:16 1626158 Link 0 |
Hi, Malonemagic. tommy58 (Dublin) - Posts: 169 - 26/07/2014 17:22:55 1626185 Link 0 |
A lot of posts here seem to be oblivious to the needs of county championships to be played, or that clubs exist at all an tseabhac (Kerry) - Posts: 441 - 26/07/2014 20:39:00 1626284 Link 0 |
We'll be playing Cork in a double-header with Galway v Kerry and, with 80k seats to fill, a quota for each county is 20k. Only Mayo will bring that support. Galway might bring 10-12k, Kerry 8-10k and Cork people will read about it on HS or in the papers. Neutrals and Armagh minor supporters will bring the total up to a max of about 55k. Playing the games in Castlebar and Killarney would definitely draw a bigger combined crowd, but all 4 sides have a good chunk of Dublin based supporters. With very few away supporters likely to travel, a Castlebar game would attract no more than 30k, with not much more likely to show up in Killarney. The atmosphere would be better in both grounds than in a Croker with the upper tier closed, however it'd only be a meeting of neighbouring counties that would make attendance gains outside Croker worthwhile. Pericles (Mayo) - Posts: 2521 - 27/07/2014 09:25:18 1626356 Link 0 |
God Tommy you're breaking my heart! ! I guess we re seeing it differently. As the thread is about rewarding the team that wins province, I believe you can only compare calculations from the point a team exits ; ie provincial winners compared to beaten finalists, provincial quarter final winners compared to beaten quarter finalists, and so on. In this way you will see that going the direct route gives you a 1 or 2 game advantage at most. It's difference of viewpoint. in the case of final it only gives you 1 game advantage. Cork are now back at the same stage as Kerry, so we're Kerry sufficiently rewarded for beating them. I think that was the essence of the original post on this thread Malonemagic (Laois) - Posts: 766 - 27/07/2014 12:34:29 1626424 Link 0 |
Hello, Malonemagic. tommy58 (Dublin) - Posts: 169 - 27/07/2014 13:52:14 1626458 Link 0 |
You don't have to play a team coming through the qualifiers after coming off a win after you have just lost. You avoid the other provincial winners in the quarter finals. Seems reward enough to me. doublehop (Kildare) - Posts: 4172 - 27/07/2014 14:01:18 1626464 Link 0 |
My final post on this topic Tommy. You mention that the games it takes a team to win a province aren't included in odds. So also then, the games it takes a qualifier can also be ignored. A provincial winner and a losing provincial quarter finalist, both have 1/8 chance at that stage. The only advantage gained is playing two less games on the route, thereby making them 4 times more likely to win all Ireland. Not 16. . You cannot exclude one team's route, but not the other. So is 4 Times a big enough reward? And at that stage when all teams are 1/8 why not give champions home advantage ? Malonemagic (Laois) - Posts: 766 - 27/07/2014 15:58:50 1626554 Link 0 |
No. crossfieldball (Galway) - Posts: 650 - 27/07/2014 21:24:59 1626880 Link 0 |
27/07/2014 21:24:59 ormondbannerman (Clare) - Posts: 13473 - 27/07/2014 21:35:20 1626899 Link 0 |