(Oldest Posts First) - Go To The Latest Post
Naysayer - Not at all. I wouldn't say people on about negative football see it entirely as 13 men behind the ball. It does take an impressive workrate. Players know their jobs when without the ball. Once they regain possession then players are up in support. There's a number of counties dropping back players alright though and you'd have to wonder what their at. Players seem back for sake of it with no method to their play at all. When there's a clash of these polar opposite approaches, personally I'd be more impressed of the attacking approach if it wins out. There'll be some interesting battles of both approaches to come. legendzxix (Kerry) - Posts: 7853 - 23/07/2014 21:37:47 1625060 Link 0 |
I prefer positive defensive football over negative attacking ruanua (Donegal) - Posts: 4966 - 23/07/2014 21:46:20 1625066 Link 0 |
I don't personally consider "Defensive football" and "Negative Football" to be the same thing. GaryMc82 (Derry) - Posts: 3017 - 24/07/2014 12:40:42 1625254 Link 0 |
Negative football for me would be a team using Rugby tackles, biting, eye gouging, punching, stamping on players and blantantly Injuring an opponent etc. Basically serious Cynical foul's, that stop opposition teams from playing at all costs, without any other game plan in place. TheMaster (Mayo) - Posts: 16187 - 24/07/2014 13:16:17 1625281 Link 0 |
Should the title of this thread not read ATTACKING FOOTBALL V ULSTER FOOTBALL? DUBJOHN (Dublin) - Posts: 932 - 24/07/2014 14:03:32 1625325 Link 0 |
Ruanua can you please explain what you mean by the term "negative attacking "? DUBJOHN (Dublin) - Posts: 932 - 24/07/2014 14:07:01 1625330 Link 0 |
DUBJOHN MuckrossHead (Donegal) - Posts: 5028 - 24/07/2014 14:29:50 1625349 Link 0 |
Rua i think you've just proved me correct! you're still trying to read my last post aren't you! DUBJOHN (Dublin) - Posts: 932 - 24/07/2014 15:17:13 1625405 Link 0 |
Apologises rua that last post of mine was meant for mucky! DUBJOHN (Dublin) - Posts: 932 - 24/07/2014 15:19:27 1625406 Link 0 |
@GaryMc82 - ah sure look it's a negative approach, everyone's entitled to their opinion. As I've said I did enjoy the Ulster final. Hardly a need to say any more. Regards championships that have slipped away, sure tis all part of the championship unless you win it out! Derry might want to focus on getting through rounds themselves and as a division 1 team not get undone by lower league opposition. I'm sure ye'd like to be in Tipperary's shoes, who beat Longford, and are preparing to take on Galway. legendzxix (Kerry) - Posts: 7853 - 24/07/2014 17:48:52 1625501 Link 0 |
legendzxix GaryMc82 (Derry) - Posts: 3017 - 24/07/2014 19:49:48 1625567 Link 0 |
That's right Gary, if only Kerry fans could see their team win an All-Ireland or 2 they might lose that chip on their shoulder! Soma (UK) - Posts: 2630 - 24/07/2014 20:15:46 1625577 Link 0 |
i would just call that defensive and cautious fabio8 (USA) - Posts: 2182 - 24/07/2014 20:24:22 1625583 Link 0 |
Fair enough Fabio, but for me it says that one team is more preoccupied with thinking of how they can stop their opponents scoring than trying to score themselves, dedicating as they are more resources to their defensive end of the pitch than the attacking end when a 50:50 ball is contested in the middle. I consider that to be a negative approach. In your view is there a limit? If they had 11 players in defence and 2 in attack for the start of the half is this team then just being a little extra defensive and cautious, but not negative? Of course how they would get the ball to their 2 forwards who would be surrounded by 6 defenders, would be fascinating from a tactical perspective I am sure. Soma (UK) - Posts: 2630 - 24/07/2014 20:44:58 1625591 Link 0 |
exactly you have to find the correct balance..donegal for instance lacked enough of a balance in 2011 most notably the semi final whereas they had an excellent balance in 2012 putting up great scores in the process fabio8 (USA) - Posts: 2182 - 24/07/2014 21:11:02 1625606 Link 0 |
Would you say Donegal were negative in 2011 then Fabio? I believe they were, as were Dublin in the infamous 14 point game, but I am sure others would say it was a perfect defensive strategy and had McFadden goaled instead of pointed it would have been a perfect plan. Soma (UK) - Posts: 2630 - 24/07/2014 21:22:05 1625614 Link 0 |
Ohtobearosie SamOnErrigal (Donegal) - Posts: 1427 - 24/07/2014 22:00:50 1625632 Link 0 |
well in the 2nd half against dublin i would say they were way over cautious when they were clearly in control and should have pushed on and won the game especially with the extra man...inexperienced side though at the time and things were going well for them so i can see why they were fabio8 (USA) - Posts: 2182 - 24/07/2014 22:01:29 1625633 Link 0 |
@GaryMc82 - You're proving my point as well. Supporters of negative football tend to get very negative. The qualifiers give all counties an opportunity sure we availed of it from Q2 in 09. legendzxix (Kerry) - Posts: 7853 - 24/07/2014 22:01:55 1625634 Link 0 |
legendzxix GaryMc82 (Derry) - Posts: 3017 - 25/07/2014 13:53:32 1625844 Link 0 |