HoganStand GAA Football and Hurling

National Forum

Big Flaw In Hawkeye System

(Oldest Posts First) - Go To The Latest Post

You need to Login to Post

Should McGrath's goal for Tipp have stood? Triple H (Meath) - Posts: 551 - 28/07/2019 16:22:48 2217644 Link
Replying To Triple H: "Should McGrath's goal for Tipp have stood?" No. It was an invalid passage of play. Proven by the fact the ball had gone over the bar. Would you prefer Hawkeye was ignored. What this proves is that hawkeye is correct and worth the hassle. That point could be huge by the end of the game. daytona11 (Kildare) - Posts: 4012 - 28/07/2019 16:26:04 2217648 Link
Replying To Triple H: "Should McGrath's goal for Tipp have stood?" Also we need to be told when the ref blew his whistle. I think it was well before McGrath finished to the net. So no big deal really. daytona11 (Kildare) - Posts: 4012 - 28/07/2019 16:27:26 2217650 Link
Replying To Triple H: "Should McGrath's goal for Tipp have stood?" Hawkeye done its job ? The discussion on the goal and whether it should be given is valid but hawkeye isnt the issue here ? waynoI (Dublin) - Posts: 13650 - 28/07/2019 16:29:37 2217652 Link
Hawkeye needs to go Benjy1000 (Cavan) - Posts: 85 - 28/07/2019 16:30:26 2217653 Link
Replying To daytona11: "No. It was an invalid passage of play. Proven by the fact the ball had gone over the bar. Would you prefer Hawkeye was ignored. What this proves is that hawkeye is correct and worth the hassle. That point could be huge by the end of the game." Eh I take different view, ref allowed Puck out. So would it be OK to erase play 30 secs, 1 min, 2 mins later? They now claiming communication problems with ref. They had ample opportunity to signal for Hawkeye. Fair enough it was a point, but ref signalled play to continue. I have a feeling there will be more on this. arock (Dublin) - Posts: 4897 - 28/07/2019 16:37:06 2217655 Link
No flaw in the Hawkeye system. The issue was with communication to the ref. Hawkeye9212 (Donegal) - Posts: 266 - 28/07/2019 16:40:29 2217657 Link
Replying To arock: "Eh I take different view, ref allowed Puck out. So would it be OK to erase play 30 secs, 1 min, 2 mins later? They now claiming communication problems with ref. They had ample opportunity to signal for Hawkeye. Fair enough it was a point, but ref signalled play to continue. I have a feeling there will be more on this." What puck out? The ref didnt realise the ball was over therefore the ball hadnt gone put of play. There was no puck out. Play just continued. daytona11 (Kildare) - Posts: 4012 - 28/07/2019 16:41:43 2217659 Link
Replying To arock: "Eh I take different view, ref allowed Puck out. So would it be OK to erase play 30 secs, 1 min, 2 mins later? They now claiming communication problems with ref. They had ample opportunity to signal for Hawkeye. Fair enough it was a point, but ref signalled play to continue. I have a feeling there will be more on this." What puck out? conordee (Galway) - Posts: 440 - 28/07/2019 17:54:35 2217728 Link
Replying To Triple H: "Should McGrath's goal for Tipp have stood?" No the keeper played on after catching the ball. The game shouldve been restarted with a puckout after a point. One of the better decisions the ref made on the day! Viking66 (Wexford) - Posts: 11918 - 28/07/2019 18:15:38 2217747 Link
Replying To daytona11: "No. It was an invalid passage of play. Proven by the fact the ball had gone over the bar. Would you prefer Hawkeye was ignored. What this proves is that hawkeye is correct and worth the hassle. That point could be huge by the end of the game." Hawkeye can't be ignored.Does it take 32 seconds.A lot can happen in hurling in 32 seconds as Mcgrath's goal shows.I wonder could Hawkeye technology be speeded up. endgame (Roscommon) - Posts: 2168 - 28/07/2019 18:38:08 2217764 Link
The right decision, but the speed of getting it across needs be looked at. In another scenario, let's say a player got a red card for a very dirty pull in that time that was played. Would that have to be rescinded too, as the passage of play was invalid? By the same logic yes, but it'd be extremely awkward to let him back on the pitch. WanPintWin (Galway) - Posts: 2043 - 28/07/2019 19:31:08 2217791 Link
I think rule wise the passage of play was very black and white. If it hadnt been a point then the keeper was free to play on and the goal wouldve stood. Viking66 (Wexford) - Posts: 11918 - 28/07/2019 19:59:54 2217807 Link
Replying To Viking66: "I think rule wise the passage of play was very black and white. If it hadnt been a point then the keeper was free to play on and the goal wouldve stood." Don't think that's in dispute by anybody.The correct decision was made.The problem was the delay,whether or not that can be addressed. endgame (Roscommon) - Posts: 2168 - 28/07/2019 20:16:04 2217814 Link
That's one of the worst officiated game's I've seen in a while,. ef was shocking j mc grath second yollow was a ed all day, how he missed the closed fist to o keefe is beyond me? Monkeycatcher (Meath) - Posts: 155 - 28/07/2019 20:28:30 2217829 Link
Replying To arock: "Eh I take different view, ref allowed Puck out. So would it be OK to erase play 30 secs, 1 min, 2 mins later? They now claiming communication problems with ref. They had ample opportunity to signal for Hawkeye. Fair enough it was a point, but ref signalled play to continue. I have a feeling there will be more on this." Wrong there was not puck out, play continued. In my opinion ever thing that transpired was correct. If the point was noted straight away a puck out would be the result. The play that developed was not a legal play unfortunately. If a goal was not scored we would not be having this discussion. Canuck (Waterford) - Posts: 2662 - 28/07/2019 20:30:00 2217830 Link
Replying To Viking66: "I think rule wise the passage of play was very black and white. If it hadnt been a point then the keeper was free to play on and the goal wouldve stood." Correct. Canuck (Waterford) - Posts: 2662 - 28/07/2019 20:30:58 2217833 Link
Replying To Viking66: "I think rule wise the passage of play was very black and white. If it hadnt been a point then the keeper was free to play on and the goal wouldve stood." Correct. Canuck (Waterford) - Posts: 2662 - 28/07/2019 20:47:22 2217846 Link
Replying To Benjy1000: "Hawkeye needs to go" Fully agree, we should put 2 lads down there. White coats. StoreysTash (Wexford) - Posts: 1734 - 29/07/2019 16:11:11 2218290 Link
Replying To Canuck: "Wrong there was not puck out, play continued. In my opinion ever thing that transpired was correct. If the point was noted straight away a puck out would be the result. The play that developed was not a legal play unfortunately. If a goal was not scored we would not be having this discussion." Missing the point if Hawkeye is deployed game has to stop no other sport allows game to continue for 32 secs while a decision is being consider. I am right and you are incorrect. You simply cannot allow game to continue ref indicated he couldn't hear because of noise. This is why GAAis amateur sport. arock (Dublin) - Posts: 4897 - 29/07/2019 16:33:51 2218316 Link