National Forum

Galway Football thread

(Oldest Posts First) - Go To The Latest Post


Coincidentally, I remember during KW last league campaign as Galway manager we were short midfielders for nearly the entire campaign. I think he referred to it as "torture" at one stage.
Not overly concerned with today. Backs will get sharper as season goes on. Connacht final will still be a kick of the ball between both teams. Ros, Monaghan and Donegal look like they could be the most winnable games, if Donegal pull the handbrake like they did last year. Otherwise, we may need a draw or a win against Armagh Saturday.

gaillimhboy (Galway) - Posts: 397 - 25/01/2026 21:39:55    2653198

Link

Happy with the new lads today, McDonagh x2, Mulhearn, O'Laoi and Shay on introduction did well all things considered.

Discipline cost us along with all those goal chances!!!! A good spread of players to come back. We will be alright.

ahsure. (Galway) - Posts: 1751 - 25/01/2026 21:43:02    2653200

Link

Just watching back the goal chances Molloy finnerty and DOF tried to burst the ball shooting mulhern was under a bit more pressure getting shot off

A side footed roller is so much better as with McGrath Beirne Mcdonagh goals

Agree mchugh was good even when going was tough

Watching game back finnerty was excellent great option all game

jm25 (Galway) - Posts: 1907 - 25/01/2026 21:43:23    2653201

Link

Replying To AnCrúiscínLán:  "Imo, Mulherne was dodgy today - for a CF crucial pass intercepted. He also lacks physicality. I was impressed with young McGlinchey when introduced - competitive attitude, composure and good positional awareness, definitely one for the future. Also thought McHugh had a solid game, but he must step up as a scoring option. Walsh needs to work on physical conditioning. O'Flaherty, as with Silke, for all their attributes, are not cousins of forwards. But I think Pj wanted a bit of physicality in that area. It's early days but there definitely were square pegs forced into round holes today."
I agree about Mulhern, made a lot of mistakes.. maybe it was nerves but PJ seems to have a lot of faith for him bit not to be subbed off. Oisin McDonagh didn't do a lot wrong, was showing for every ball but it wasn't coming into him quick enough. Fionn McDonagh...what a weapon this lad is, Mayo didn't know what to do with him, he can causes chaos, can see him being a mainstay in full forward line. Shane McGrath did well for the time he got, again maybe nerves, big step up today for all these lads. Midfield is a problem area with the missing players, Mcglinchy could be the key

WonTon5 (Galway) - Posts: 117 - 25/01/2026 22:40:28    2653218

Link

Don't know what to make out of that game, Mayo clearly the fitter team with the most work done but Galway could easily have got at least a draw out of the game.

Little defending in the contest and only poor shooting and decision making prevented a even bigger score for both teams. Moving swiftly on to the next game where the aim is to avoid relegation now.

Drax_the_destroyer (UK) - Posts: 668 - 25/01/2026 23:26:12    2653224

Link

Replying To jm25:  "Just watching back the goal chances Molloy finnerty and DOF tried to burst the ball shooting mulhern was under a bit more pressure getting shot off

A side footed roller is so much better as with McGrath Beirne Mcdonagh goals

Agree mchugh was good even when going was tough

Watching game back finnerty was excellent great option all game"
We were missing 2 of our main defenders. Donnacha McHugh and Jack Coyne was not fully fit once they return our defence will be a different story wuth class act hennelly back there to.

S1234 (Mayo) - Posts: 725 - 26/01/2026 00:53:51    2653233

Link

It's only January. It's only the league. They did what they could but a lot of lessons learned. Some height in midfield and a 2 point scorer would have made a big difference. Cooke is a massive loss. Joyce made this choice himself weeks ago he stated if Peter was to continue to work in London then he wouldn't be part of the galway panel, that's from Joyce's own mouth so if Peter said he was willing to commute and train with galway (like he did last year) this wouldn't be enough for padraic.

Gearoid1998ffowaed (Galway) - Posts: 210 - 26/01/2026 01:17:12    2653237

Link

Replying To jm25:  "Just watching back the goal chances Molloy finnerty and DOF tried to burst the ball shooting mulhern was under a bit more pressure getting shot off

A side footed roller is so much better as with McGrath Beirne Mcdonagh goals

Agree mchugh was good even when going was tough

Watching game back finnerty was excellent great option all game"
Finnerty was class as per usual, needs to work on finishing goal chances though along with all the forwards, was an issue last year too.
The first half league is gonna be hard going with all the absentees but great opportunity to get game time into the new lads like in 2024. mullhern and the 2 mcdonaghs looked promising today

Jonnytest (Galway) - Posts: 5 - 26/01/2026 02:24:01    2653242

Link

11 points down in our own backyard and Moran started subbing off key players, giving us a chink of an opportunity to make a comeback. But let's face it, Galway were way off the mark. Not a good start. Cleaned in midfield and almost all breaks until McGlinchey came in. Backs very porous and gifting 2 point frees repeatedly. Forwards' goal taking ability very poor and were again lacking clear attacking plays. What's happening with our coaching? We're looking quite poorly prepared for a Div 1 campaign. We were actually being hammered until we saved some face at the end once Mayo subbed off those men. Concerning.

togoutlads (Galway) - Posts: 1115 - 26/01/2026 09:52:32    2653255

Link

Gleeson - 5: Kickouts not good enough for this level and a desperate free taker. Flaherty needs to be looked at again if he is the next option.
McGrath - 6: Mixed the good with bad.
Fitzgerald - 6: Very uncomfortable on the ball. Still think Kelly needs to go FB.
Glynn - 7: Did ok.
O'Laoi - 7: Some engine but got injured again.
McHugh - 6: Wasn't great for the first 2 goals.
Molloy - 6: Doesn't bring much to the team going forward or defensively.
Kelly - 6: Not a midfielder but injuries dictated him playing midfield yesterday. Would prefer him FB.
Hernon - 5: No impact.
Flaherty - 6: Scored 1 point but could/should have scored 1-2. Better coming off the bench.
Mulhearn - 6: Solid debut. Poor free at the end of the first half led to Mayo 2-pointer. Looks classy.
Silke - 5: No impact going forward. Played out of position.
O McDonagh - 7: 2 great scores but poor missed free. Promising start.
Finnerty - 8: So good at times. Needs to improve his goal finishing.
F McDonagh - 9: Excellent debut. Couldn't have done much better.

Subs - 7: McGlinchey, McGrath and Barret all made a difference but Barret gave away a 2 pointer and silly black card. Walsh didn't look great.

Does anyone know who was cut from the panel after the FBD?

jobseekersbent (Galway) - Posts: 389 - 26/01/2026 10:07:39    2653259

Link

We obviously have alot of injuries in midfield and could not win a ball or break but how does Gleeson not try to change it work a short kick out harder with arc of course but we needed to change something. Also he should be nowhere near taking a long range free 45 for us. SW has certainly bulked up over the winter from his cameo. New guns were the most positive McDonaghs & Mulhern. Worried about our defence and the goals and chances we coughed up but we also had plenty of other goal chances. Kelly struggeld and Silke is not a wing forward. Doesn get any easier with Armagh away next. A positiive league campaign would be survival and unearthing a couple of players but on yday showing 2 x McFDonaghs & Mulhern did well. I would like Flaherty to be given a chance. Do we put kelly back to 3? Silke is not a WF either. Cooke gone

Eire89 (Galway) - Posts: 459 - 26/01/2026 10:11:33    2653260

Link

Not sure if the glass is half full or half empty after that performance. From a half full perspective there was some positive greenshoots. Fionn McDonagh is looking like he will be a starter and a top player. The other novices look like they will be decent sub options when we are back at full strength. While Mayo have as many players to come back as us, most of them are like for like,or very marginal improvements over what they had yesterday , whereas our guys coming back should give a more significant lift. Other positive was the amount of chances that we created. I cant recall us ever creating as many goal chances - i counted 10, including the 2 we scored. On the glass half empty front, we continue to make terrible mistakes all over the pitch, midfield is a shambles, and, lets be honest, Mayo were poor too and apart from a spirited enough fightback the scoreline could have been a lot worse . Summary: It could be a difficult year. Winning Connacht is still a good possibility but im afraid that the gap between the Connacht counties and the market leaders is growing.

anotheralias (Galway) - Posts: 1021 - 26/01/2026 10:20:08    2653265

Link

Fionn McDonagh looked vastly superior yesterday than he looked versus the Roscommon champs some weeks back. Either he's improving in leaps and bounds in with the intercounty squad, or you'd have some concerns about Mayo's rearguard on yesterday's form.

Pope_Benedict (Galway) - Posts: 4520 - 26/01/2026 12:25:36    2653299

Link

Replying To Pope_Benedict:  "Fionn McDonagh looked vastly superior yesterday than he looked versus the Roscommon champs some weeks back. Either he's improving in leaps and bounds in with the intercounty squad, or you'd have some concerns about Mayo's rearguard on yesterday's form."
He looekd very good yday and in a funny way Galway play yday suited him more direct than Moycullens running game. only ball we won cleanly in midfield was him when he drifted out too

Eire89 (Galway) - Posts: 459 - 26/01/2026 12:57:50    2653314

Link

Replying To Pope_Benedict:  "Fionn McDonagh looked vastly superior yesterday than he looked versus the Roscommon champs some weeks back. Either he's improving in leaps and bounds in with the intercounty squad, or you'd have some concerns about Mayo's rearguard on yesterday's form."
I thought he was good against Brigid's to be honest. Just didn't have a lot of help around him.

Marooned (Galway) - Posts: 2473 - 26/01/2026 13:44:57    2653327

Link

Replying To Marooned:  "I thought he was good against Brigid's to be honest. Just didn't have a lot of help around him."
Have we any chance getting Ger Davoren back in for midfield and the throw in or is he abroad? Keep Fionn McDonagh forward so he keep doing what he does best. He was very strong against Bridgids.

Gearoid1998ffowaed (Galway) - Posts: 210 - 26/01/2026 14:55:02    2653357

Link

Replying To Gearoid1998ffowaed:  "Have we any chance getting Ger Davoren back in for midfield and the throw in or is he abroad? Keep Fionn McDonagh forward so he keep doing what he does best. He was very strong against Bridgids."
I thought I saw Davoren with subs in stand

Roche did warm up and Charlie power was on bench

Maughan and Liam Costello were there yday too so hard to think of many been dropped

jm25 (Galway) - Posts: 1907 - 26/01/2026 15:09:42    2653363

Link

We are Israels 2nd biggest trading partner. So obviously Loads of companies have links to Israel

Allianz parent company was specifically name in the UN Special Rapporteurs report as being complicit in genocide. If these other companies you are all mentioning have links to Israel but have not been named as complicit in genocide by the UN you are not comparing like with like.

Several people have said this and answered the question as to why Allianz yet they are ignored and many of you just keep naming other companies with links to Israel but have not been named in the report.

Even if according to yourself they are the same. They are in fact not and its safe to assume the Special Rapporteur has probably done more research than you

I've no problem with players refusing to be seen to promote Allianz. I've also no problem with players being fine with it

I look forward to everyone continuing to name companies not named by the UN as complicit in genocide and asking why not them despite being told why several times.

galwayfball (Galway) - Posts: 1707 - 26/01/2026 16:40:45    2653396

Link

Replying To jm25:  "I thought I saw Davoren with subs in stand

Roche did warm up and Charlie power was on bench

Maughan and Liam Costello were there yday too so hard to think of many been dropped"
I heard it said that Sigerson players were excused. That is only hearsay but could be true.

backtooldwall (Galway) - Posts: 208 - 26/01/2026 18:47:29    2653426

Link