(Oldest Posts First) - Go To The Latest Post
The cccc met yesterday hill16no1man (Dublin) - Posts: 12665 - 07/06/2017 10:31:18 1996262 Link 1 |
Jesus lads Tommy Walsh incident being used here as a reference, any more straws to clutch at? MesAmis (Dublin) - Posts: 13795 - 07/06/2017 10:31:28 1996263 Link 0 |
I must admit I would prefer if DC didn't get suspended but he can clearly be seen giving the linesman a light push and shouting abuse at him. The rule seems fairly straight forward too. What I find funny is certain Dublin supporters trying to justify / defend DC on account of the "attention" he gets on the pitch. Every top class player get abuse, be it a club or county level. It is one thing I would love to see stamped out. The Gouch got it every time he pulled on a jersey but he very seldom let it get to him. Over the years may Dublin players have dished out this abuse, Keith Barr telling Mick Lyons "his ma was a slapper" & Micks classic response is one famous example. Ciaran Wheelan is another former Dublin player who had a habit of giving out special attention to his direct opponent as does Philly McMahon, Eoghan O'Gara and DC himself. So Dublin fans please remember that while you are busy point the finger at everyone else that you need to get your own house in order first. anto_meath (Meath) - Posts: 108 - 07/06/2017 10:38:24 1996267 Link 0 |
It was a soft push as most people agree and maybe the officials didn't think much of it at the time, but the ref is entitled to have a think about it and decide that it's not good enough even if minor. When McCarthy got a black in the final people were banging on that it was a rash decision by the ref, there should be video refs etc. The officials would have been negligent in their duty to not include it. If they didn't then they would be condoning pushing officials even if it was minor Superglue (Kerry) - Posts: 1283 - 07/06/2017 10:39:27 1996270 Link 0 |
Regardless if the referee saw it or didn't see it or dealt with it or didn't deal with it or reported it or didn't report it. Connolly did it. It was inoccuous. it was stupid it was harmless. But Connolly is probably the most high profile player in the country. He knows he's under scrutiny and it was in a game that Dublin were always going to win. No matter what mistakes Diarmaid makes he never seems to learn from them (Discipline wise). He doesn't need everyone to defend him he just needs to Cop on a bit. In reality he'll possibly miss one Competetive Game (Quarter final) hell be fresh for the Semi and Final. no harm done. I seem to remember he got off a genuine red card to play in the AI Final in 2011. maybe this is a bit of Karma!!
fearcliste (Wexford) - Posts: 178 - 07/06/2017 10:41:29 1996272 Link 0 |
Not sure I follow Superglue, are you saying that if a red card incident occurs in a match, a referee doesn't issue it in the hope that he'll get a longer ban on review by the CCCC?
keithlemon (Australia) - Posts: 920 - 07/06/2017 10:42:26 1996273 Link 0 |
Had he got a red card in the game for this incident the suspension would still have been for 12 weeks.
Soma (UK) - Posts: 2630 - 07/06/2017 11:10:28 1996299 Link 1 |
Is Philly McMahon injured or why was he not playing against Carlow. xxx (Mayo) - Posts: 1275 - 07/06/2017 11:11:52 1996302 Link 0 |
He should take his ban, It was minor enough but rules are rules. Especially as there are 2 similar recent incidents that received 12 weeks (Comerford and McGeeney). unclegerry (Mayo) - Posts: 1223 - 07/06/2017 11:13:29 1996306 Link 0 |
No he wouldn't, he would still get 12 weeks. Where are you getting a one game ban from? If anything, after a straight red for laying a hand on the linesman, the 12 week ban would be more clear cut.
Loughduff Lad (Cavan) - Posts: 2466 - 07/06/2017 11:13:37 1996307 Link 1 |
The difference for me between this incident and Connolly's tow other high profile incidents, the read cards against Mayo and Donegal in All-Ireland Semi-Finals, is that this incident seems fairly black and white to me. He pushed the linesman and the rulebook clearly states that there is a 12 week suspension for such an infringement. Fair enough. MesAmis (Dublin) - Posts: 13795 - 07/06/2017 11:18:40 1996314 Link 0 |
The lads on Newstalk last night were saying that a red card would have resulted in a 4 week ban (1 match) Apologies if I'm wrong but that's where I'm getting it from keithlemon (Australia) - Posts: 920 - 07/06/2017 11:24:29 1996320 Link 0 |
He was suspended for game.
jacktheDub (Dublin) - Posts: 944 - 07/06/2017 11:24:40 1996322 Link 0 |
He was serving a one match ban for abusive language towards a referee in the league final
keithlemon (Australia) - Posts: 920 - 07/06/2017 11:25:27 1996324 Link 0 |
Thatd fine if it were within the rules to change your mind after the game But it's not within the rules to do that is the point im making. a ref cannot take no action on a strike offence in a game and then after the match decide you know what I think I now feel he deserves a red card for that and proceed to get him suspended. it's not how it works hill16no1man (Dublin) - Posts: 12665 - 07/06/2017 11:31:28 1996332 Link 0 |
Thats fine thats your opinion But equally you cannot decide to break the rules like the gaa are doing. every weekend offences go unpunished or don't receive the required punishment The gaa can't go back on games and decide the ref was wrong here so we are going to re ref it now and change decisions he made. Its not how it works. Meath v Louth in 2010 is an example they knew the ref and umpires made a wrong decisom but their hands were tied just as they should be here as that's the rules. hill16no1man (Dublin) - Posts: 12665 - 07/06/2017 11:36:02 1996334 Link 0 |
Think Newstalk are wrong here. 1 Match ban for a straight red is correct if its a standard one, bad tackle, foul play, punching etc. However this was not standard. The rules state that a incident involving laying a hand on an official is 12 weeks. So whether he got a straight red or not at the time, the rules state 12 weeks, which is what he got. He cannot get any lower for this incident.
Loughduff Lad (Cavan) - Posts: 2466 - 07/06/2017 11:37:49 1996335 Link 0 |
Far more serious? Do you even remember it? Players from both sides were involved in pushing and shoving and Walsh had his hurl extended and it hit the ref. It isn't even relevant when it comes to this thread. How in gods name you think it was a very serious incident is beyond me? In that case you should go through every hurling game and pick out all the incidents where a player purposely digs his marker into the ribs with the hurl, which is a strike which should lead to a ban. Picking out the odd incident and trying to say Connolly is being treated unfairly is just laughable.
TheFlaker (Mayo) - Posts: 8366 - 07/06/2017 11:37:58 1996336 Link 0 |
Which I presume Brendan Murphy will now equally recieve for his abusing an official in Saturday's match as he left the pitch. Those are the rules and must be applied equally
hill16no1man (Dublin) - Posts: 12665 - 07/06/2017 11:39:08 1996338 Link 0 |
I don't know how they came to that conclusion but if he had been sent off it would have been for minor interference with a match official and that has a minimum suspension of 12 weeks.
Soma (UK) - Posts: 2630 - 07/06/2017 11:43:06 1996343 Link 0 |