(Oldest Posts First) - Go To The Latest Post
I was hoping he was joking when he brought that up, he is hardly serious?
TheFlaker (Mayo) - Posts: 8366 - 07/06/2017 08:29:37 1996172 Link 0 |
What would've happened if he'd been sent off at the time? Does he not still get the 12 weeks minimum even if the ref deals with it at the time and gives him a straight red for it? wicklu (Wicklow) - Posts: 331 - 07/06/2017 08:33:30 1996176 Link 0 |
DC needs to live by his actions know they have consequences , as I said on Dubs page gutted if I don't get to see him play , DC is what class football is all about , that bit of individualism that few have , nobody will hurt more than DC I've seen first hand the work that goes on away from the lights ,to put so much in and then not through injury have half your summer taken away , but as a GAA fan AND as someone who has posted often on here re lack of respect for officials there is a part of me saying HQ have to do this. Word needs to go out loud and clear the type of behaviour DC resorted to is understandable but never acceptable. Damothedub (Dublin) - Posts: 5193 - 07/06/2017 08:36:09 1996177 Link 1 |
Lads, I'll start this off by saying I am 100% dedicated Galway man but actually a genuine fan of Dublin football and the way the team goes about its football and swashbuckling performances. The_DOC (Galway) - Posts: 761 - 07/06/2017 08:39:25 1996178 Link 1 |
If the referee say the incident why did he NOT punish it? How come it found its way into the referee's report? now surely the referee didn't watch SKY analysis before he filled out his report? All these officials are mic'ed up so seems odd it finds its way into the report arock (Dublin) - Posts: 4953 - 07/06/2017 08:39:33 1996179 Link 1 |
It's always someone else's fault . TheRightStuff (Donegal) - Posts: 1688 - 07/06/2017 08:48:18 1996185 Link 1 |
Not sure if the man in question could be calling it a with hunt given what he has got off with down the years and he seems guilty as charged. Naysayer (Antrim) - Posts: 2071 - 07/06/2017 08:54:17 1996188 Link 0 |
Jesus lads Tommy Walsh incident being used here as a reference, any more straws to clutch at? Look through my posts in the past, I have defended the Dubs when they get lazy criticism in relation to funding etc etc. but this defence of Connolly is cringy. And the excuse of him getting more abuse off the ball than any other player is nonsense. Murphy gets it just as bad. In both games last year Keegan did nothing off the ball that could be deemed dirty or foul play, he simply stuck to him like glue and outplayed him, but he got punished because Connolly was being protected following a media campaign to highlight what a tough time he gets off the ball. Anyone who was at both games and watched them closely saw he was simply marked out of it , but this is never brought up. People simply relate back to the incident with Keegan in 2015 and think the 2 of them spend an hour knocking lumps out of each other, it's pure nonsense. Connolly is one of the most gifted footballers I have ever seen and is a joy to watch when things are going his way, but when they are not and he is having a quiet game, the assumption from his fans are he is being assaulted off the ball for 70 mins, give it a rest lads. TheFlaker (Mayo) - Posts: 8366 - 07/06/2017 09:15:25 1996197 Link 1 |
Would have got a one match ban for a straight red
keithlemon (Australia) - Posts: 920 - 07/06/2017 09:21:07 1996202 Link 1 |
Do not appeal Liamwalkinstown (Dublin) - Posts: 8166 - 07/06/2017 09:30:48 1996209 Link 0 |
He broke the rule on two counts....laid hand on ref and foul and abusive language towards him. It was in referee's report. He got the appropriate punishment as stated on the rules.....no more no less. There isn't even grounds for appeal and any attempt should be thrown out. It's not a witchhunt....it's just application of the rules. southmeathgael (Meath) - Posts: 972 - 07/06/2017 09:35:13 1996217 Link 0 |
Exactly the linesman is at least 40 he should have walked away from the game 10 years ago if he can't get basic calls like that correct
hill16no1man (Dublin) - Posts: 12665 - 07/06/2017 09:36:02 1996218 Link 0 |
Exactly you can be certain a gaa official was over his shoulder when he was filling out that report telling him what to put in it.
hill16no1man (Dublin) - Posts: 12665 - 07/06/2017 09:43:22 1996227 Link 0 |
I hope Dublin don't go appealing this now and making a big meal of it. Yes, Connolly has every right to appeal if he wants to but sometimes you just got to take things like this on the chin. The rule is there, as Michael Quirke said on OTB last night, the rules of golf can be deemed severe but minor incidents but they're there. keithlemon (Australia) - Posts: 920 - 07/06/2017 09:44:38 1996230 Link 0 |
...except if it's Lee Keegan
Superglue (Kerry) - Posts: 1283 - 07/06/2017 09:48:31 1996234 Link 0 |
That makes no sense
Superglue (Kerry) - Posts: 1283 - 07/06/2017 09:52:16 1996236 Link 2 |
What doesn't make sense?
keithlemon (Australia) - Posts: 920 - 07/06/2017 09:58:51 1996240 Link 0 |
But aren't the gaa equally breaking the rules here? The ref and linesman seen the incident and deemed it not worthy of action. That therefore means the cccc have no place in this incident. We know this as often we see players get yellow cards for striking offences and the matter is classed as dealt with and there hands are tied they cannot upgrade to red card. So why now are they allowed change the rule to suit this case. hill16no1man (Dublin) - Posts: 12665 - 07/06/2017 10:04:54 1996242 Link 0 |
I actually hope this is appealed, not that i dont believe that he didnt break the rule or by the letter of the law he doesn't get the suspension, their is something murky going on here between the witnessing of the incident and the referee match report, the mentioned debrief is odd, if you are going to apply the rules so concretely on the player, grand i dont have a problem with that. If you do it without due process, however that deserves to be examined and i believe Dublin County Board has a right to do that. TheUsername (Dublin) - Posts: 4512 - 07/06/2017 10:23:10 1996254 Link 0 |
That if the ref gave him a red card there he'd have only got a 1 match ban. If that's the case then the ref was right not to red card him and put the incident in his report after. Superglue (Kerry) - Posts: 1283 - 07/06/2017 10:29:40 1996259 Link 1 |