(Oldest Posts First)
Well lads any talk about who leaving or standing for election on Sunday. Or does it make any difference>> See in lancashire a number of plaCES were voted on. Anh chance that will happen here in London. Whar do yeall thinK ??? allthesame (Derry) - Posts: 88 - 09/12/2008 15:53:27 160249 Link 0 |
Some interesting motions put forward by maccurtains, harps and round towers. I Know personally I will be supporting some them. Shamrocks (UK) - Posts: 38 - 09/12/2008 16:31:44 160299 Link 0 |
John Lacey has put in for chairman, that's all I've heard though. scruff (UK) - Posts: 467 - 09/12/2008 17:12:39 160351 Link 0 |
Niall Erskine is definately stepping down, shame I thought he done a good job. Declan Flanagan is a good GAA man but i think he is abit too quite to be on the board -- you need to voice your opinons loudly. macattack (UK) - Posts: 584 - 09/12/2008 17:47:05 160390 Link 0 |
Nominations for Sunday London Gaa (None) - Posts: 134 - 09/12/2008 21:38:52 160613 Link 0 |
Youth Officer London Gaa (None) - Posts: 134 - 09/12/2008 21:40:24 160615 Link 0 |
what motions have been put forward? Rosineri1 (UK) - Posts: 2099 - 10/12/2008 12:41:51 160985 Link 0 |
did you see this on the main page, a case of taking rule 10e part 1 of the official guide too far i think The Cat (UK) - Posts: 403 - 10/12/2008 14:10:29 161070 Link 0 |
lads look back to last years rule brought in by kilburn i think it should be abolished ,that any u21 can play both senior and junior , i think this was done to try to keep their senior team a float when they knew it was falling at the seems ! The_Ditch (UK) - Posts: 43 - 10/12/2008 21:58:45 161547 Link 0 |
that rule helped kilburn in no real way, when it came to playing st.gabriels we were told the motion hadn't passed at croke park evel so we had to award the game to gabriels having peviously thought we could play some of our younger lads, the club did this in the interest of the younger lads. I think it is a good rule personally young lads hardly get two or three games a year in the underage system in London imparticular at minor and u-21 level. the rule was intended for London born lads as i understand, not for any u-21 county star to hop between grades. I suppose the meaning behind the rule is if you have young player you want to try and improve by giving him a taste of senior you wont ruin his whole summer by denying him the chance to play junior. To be honest ditch i don't think your club would be too worried by any u-21 who could avail of this rule anyway. padraigoduill (UK) - Posts: 45 - 11/12/2008 11:27:38 161804 Link 0 |
well it seems unfair for other clubs who struggle with numbers , when kilburn the only hurling club with a good minor structure to ask lads to jump up and down fixtures senior and junior to prevent walk overs , i dont know if croke park passed this regulation myself but it seems a good idea to me when your senior teams sinking like the kilburn , as for my self i played intermediate all year i would love to play senior champ for my club but its not worth it , i played all year i earned my place there im not going to trade that for 1 game at senior to be put onto the bench because of flyers , also i had more chance of coming out with a medal at intermedite level The_Ditch (UK) - Posts: 43 - 11/12/2008 17:41:36 162314 Link 0 |
ditch. For gods sake the motion didn't pass at congress/convention because the thick paddys didn't realise the difficulties we face with underage in london. The Cat (UK) - Posts: 403 - 12/12/2008 17:59:55 163335 Link 0 |