(Oldest Posts First) - Go To The Latest Post
any predictions for winners of intermediate semi-final & winners of senior county final ? limerickleader (UK) - Posts: 103 - 12/09/2009 13:38:13 423965 Link 0 |
macs by 10 plus.keep them quiet in coventry for a while.hope its not ten for the people who are going out to watch it.im sure macs ould be happy with 1? theneutral (UK) - Posts: 164 - 13/09/2009 01:00:35 424320 Link 0 |
the craic lmo (Wexford) - Posts: 18 - 13/09/2009 19:09:36 424587 Link 0 |
Championships arent won in april or may league form doesnt count fairplay to macs again four in a row lookin to do seven again............ moonshine (UK) - Posts: 297 - 13/09/2009 19:51:52 424609 Link 0 |
Birmingham football has taken a bit of stick over the past few weeks but all three championchips after todays results. Mick83 (Wicklow) - Posts: 67 - 13/09/2009 20:02:46 424617 Link 0 |
ossie bennett & joseph dowling 12 c`ships in 15 seasons,many other lads on 10 or 11. limerickleader (UK) - Posts: 103 - 14/09/2009 06:15:29 424900 Link 0 |
The intermediate Semi Final between St Barnabus and John Mitchells was a far better game than the Senior Championship Final and I think either team would have had a good go at either of the two Senior teams in the Senior Championship on yesterdays displays. Munsterrugby (UK) - Posts: 3 - 14/09/2009 09:29:01 424941 Link 0 |
Macs will never win an easier Championship, more to do with the others being poor than themselves being outstanding, yet they can only beat whats put in front of them. I would expect them to be beaten comprehensively in the provincial championships as the standard of Warks football is at an all time low. If they draw the London team think its St Kiernans or Mitchels they will lose heavily. Che1959 (Galway) - Posts: 56 - 14/09/2009 17:45:15 425607 Link 0 |
I have to disagree with some of the posts on here regarding the standard, i said after the casements v macs game that macs showed they were much better than the next best, they beat us with 14 men and with 5-6 to spare, they turned over casements with 8-9 to spare and if the truth be told won easy in the final 5-6 to spare. The standard will only get better if other teams can come along and push the champions which no team has suceeded in doing so this year, i hope the comments from the other teams are genuine and they make a real effort nxt year as we intend to do so. macs are a beatable team isnt every team beatable? but as the macs will say games arent won on the hoganstand but with hard work throughout the year. gael2200 (UK) - Posts: 195 - 15/09/2009 10:08:55 426134 Link 0 |
Having attended my first Warwickshire football match in 16 years on Sunday due to relocation i have to say i was very impressed with the standard of football played by both teams. The same couldn't be said about the ref i think he lost control early on and although it was not a dirty match he didn't let the game flow and the players got frustrated with him. The reason the Macks won well was because their finishing was very good, i don't think they had any more than 4 wides all day and it seemed every time they went up the field they scored. I don't like to single anyone out as its a team game but Macks had winners in the main departments and the old heads stood and held it together when it mattered. Well done to both teams i really enjoyed my day out and night ha ha. Mulligan Eamonn (None) - Posts: 896 - 15/09/2009 14:01:23 426498 Link 0 |
Well done all of the teams that fielded at PNH on Sunday. patrick (UK) - Posts: 52 - 15/09/2009 15:48:43 426676 Link 0 |
Saturday 26th September in PNH, 4PM throw-in. under 16 county final, Sean McDermotts V Roger Casements. moonshine (UK) - Posts: 297 - 15/09/2009 20:23:05 427013 Link 0 |
having watched both games on sunday, the standard of the intermediate game was excellent, where both teams gave a continious effort for the whole game this was not a stop-start game. the refree done a first rate job and was almost invisible, which is as it should be. to say the difference between the two grades was the movement of the ball from defence to atack, is silly statement . ( Although the Senior match was very stop/start, when the ball was in play its movement was quicker than in the Intermediate game and this is part of why the teams on view in the 2 games are in their respective grades. Once ahead Macs move the ball very quickly out from defence and make more scoring chances for their forwards ) the reason the ball was moved faster was because most of the time it was frees, as the players in this refrees game, spent more time as spectators like the rest of us. in the intermediate game both sides created more scoring chances than the senior game, scoring 21 points between them. michells scoring 11 points from play with 7 wides and barnabus scoring 4 points from play 6 from frees and 6 wides. i think that all clubs should now get behind and support macs as our county rep's in the club championship and good luck to them. with the result of the semi final last sunday i believe st brendans are automatically promoted to senior for 2010, it would be great for the game if both marys and barnabus stepped up a grade and play senior league, more games more expierence. hopefully it will be a revamped league with meaningfull games. maybe something like 8 teams with top four playing off for an A cup and the remainder playing off for a B cup. millbrook (UK) - Posts: 103 - 16/09/2009 08:37:20 427406 Link 0 |
The main difference between intermediate and senior is the intensity of which the game is played. At senior level you get alot less time to think and need to have a greater level of fitness to keep up with the pace of the game. Its almost comparable to League football in Ireland and Championchip, its a different kettle of fish. Mick83 (Wicklow) - Posts: 67 - 16/09/2009 12:03:12 427583 Link 0 |
lets face it lads it was a very poor final to watch as a spectator. Very little atmosphere for a final and not much good football on display. This is not taking away from the obvious effort put in by both teams who were giving everything. However any chance of a good game of football was ruined by the refs insistence on spending minutes at a time talking to players after fouls instead of simply showing the black book for the fisrt offence and a yellow card for the next. Several decent attacking chances for both sides were thwarted by the ref insisting on holding up the play. It cant be good when every one leaving the venue was discussing the refs performance and not the teams on display!! tommy g (None) - Posts: 171 - 16/09/2009 16:53:46 427959 Link 0 |
Tommy G gael2200 (UK) - Posts: 195 - 16/09/2009 20:19:03 428177 Link 0 |
Very disappointing game for a number of reasons. Too much off the ball stuff made it impossible for the ref to keep control. Thought the ref did well in impossible circumstances as he tried to impose his authority. maybe the clubs themselves could promote greater discipline from their players and do away with the spoiling tactis. Che1959 (Galway) - Posts: 56 - 16/09/2009 23:38:00 428409 Link 0 |
TommyG. As far as I could see only 2 of the Mitchels players were senior last year? As for Macs, strongest team by far in the county, but always drag it down to the gutter. Didn't stay for captains speech, that's fairly funny if he called FM's dirty. I think Macs know if they were made to play football (by referees for instance, what a wacky idea) they'd be beat a lot more regularly. You're dead right about the 2 "challenges". Until a ref stands up to them though and sends a few to the line they'll carry on regardless. Or a team stands up to them and gives out the dirt in equal measure. dowchabiy (UK) - Posts: 204 - 17/09/2009 05:27:46 428481 Link 0 |
tommg g millbrook (UK) - Posts: 103 - 17/09/2009 08:42:57 428493 Link 0 |
Macs KerryForLiam (Limerick) - Posts: 5 - 17/09/2009 22:24:48 429361 Link 0 |