Why should the penalty kick be taken from the ground as it is a free kick ? I believe that the player should have the option to kick from the hand and from within a small circle which would allow a short run up. We should not have to take them soccer style. At present i feel that a penalty kick is too easy to save as our goals are narrower than a soccer goal. The penalty should favour the team who gets it. I think this change should be implemented and given a chance !!

Cavan_Slasher (Cavan) - Posts: 10253 - 15/01/2010 11:18:23    533620

Slasher, ever try taking a peno from the hand?
Much much more scoreable off the ground. Would be different if you had a long run up of course, but sure that would be ridiculous. U cant take a big run with a free and kick, so why should you with a peno,
If you gave any lad a choice of taking a peno from the ground or from your hand, i would be surprised if anyone took it from the hand.

Liamwalkinstown (Dublin) - Posts: 8166 - 15/01/2010 11:53:09    533680

Nah

beer baron (Cavan) - Posts: 3916 - 15/01/2010 11:55:58    533684

stop lads stealing a yard or 2. easier to save from the hand, harder to get it low, hard and into the corner. from the hand tends to be higher and less powerful over a short distance

laoistownie (Laois) - Posts: 409 - 15/01/2010 12:02:24    533689

You would find that if you could kick a penalty out of the hands you would see an abundance of dropkicks.

lyoto.machida (Meath) - Posts: 343 - 15/01/2010 12:10:37    533695

Ud never score from ur hands. Keepers would love it!
With the new rules theyve moved penaltys closer to the goals now anyway, altho I cant see it helping the taker that much!

Jinxie (Meath) - Posts: 6347 - 15/01/2010 12:10:56    533696

I think a penalty kick should have six points for a score to the net and three points for a score over the bar. Too many penalty kicks end up with the team awarded the penalty getting nothing from it. At least this way there is a minimum of three points on offer should the team elect to go for that.

Squid

squidword (Louth) - Posts: 2897 - 15/01/2010 12:18:15    533705

Very good idea for a change Squid!

Liamwalkinstown (Dublin) - Posts: 8166 - 15/01/2010 12:21:45    533710

squidword
County: Louth
Posts: 1490

533705 I think a penalty kick should have six points for a score to the net and three points for a score over the bar. Too many penalty kicks end up with the team awarded the penalty getting nothing from it. At least this way there is a minimum of three points on offer should the team elect to go for that.

Squid

Good idea squid, but id alter the score awarded.
How about 2 points over the bar, cos if its 3, then theres no protection for the back of incentive to risk a tackle if the other team is garunteed a goal. But 4 points if they hit the net, so theres more to be gained if the taker takes on the challenge & goes for goal!

Jinxie (Meath) - Posts: 6347 - 15/01/2010 12:29:31    533717

The GAA have already introduced an experimental rule where the penalty spot is moved forward 2m, this is a far better idea than any of the daft suggestions on this thread.

nocky (Wexford) - Posts: 2059 - 15/01/2010 12:29:48    533718

Ara lads would yez stop. All you need is a penalty king like my good self in your team - no bother then or any need for silly rule changes.

Lockjaw (Donegal) - Posts: 9746 - 15/01/2010 12:55:35    533756

I disagree with those who say it would be easier to save !! I believe there is an art to kicking from the hand and not many players have it. I would definitely have favoured taking a penalty from my hands in my playing days as i believe it is harder for goalkeepers to read it. Anyone who has difficulty keeping a ball low with a kick from the hands should not be playing football !!

Cavan_Slasher (Cavan) - Posts: 10253 - 15/01/2010 13:12:21    533774

Jinxie,

I'd still prefer the 6 and 3 format. With regard to the backs and tackling as long as they tackle within the rules then they should have no worries about tackling. I believe the adoption this would help to insure that a player coming in on goal was not fouled deliberately (takin out of it)so as to prevent them from scoring a goal (3 points). Furthermore I could see a concept such as this adding further spice to our game of football.

nocky

Bringing the ball forward 2 mts IMO favours the goal keeper. Particularly when you have someone 6'4" between the uprights who stands 2 mts of his goal line.

Squid

squidword (Louth) - Posts: 2897 - 15/01/2010 13:35:21    533803

It is ok as it is as for me i was a penalty taker in my day and thank god i never missed.

Dellboypolecat (Tyrone) - Posts: 15069 - 15/01/2010 14:14:04    533847

Widen the goals about another 2 feet because it's hard to plant one the way they are.

northpole (Derry) - Posts: 739 - 15/01/2010 14:37:26    533881

15/01/2010 13:35:21
squidword
County: Louth
Posts: 1493

533803
Jinxie,

I'd still prefer the 6 and 3 format. With regard to the backs and tackling as long as they tackle within the rules then they should have no worries about tackling. I believe the adoption this would help to insure that a player coming in on goal was not fouled deliberately (takin out of it)so as to prevent them from scoring a goal (3 points). Furthermore I could see a concept such as this adding further spice to our game of football.

nocky

Bringing the ball forward 2 mts IMO favours the goal keeper. Particularly when you have someone 6'4" between the uprights who stands 2 mts of his goal line.

Squid
_________________

Most ridiculous post I have ever seen on HS. Are you seriously suggesting that a goal from a penalty should be worth SIX points??? Are you trying to encourage players to dive in the box/"manufacture" penalties?

And please explain how bringing the ball closer to the goal favours the goalkeeper again? I also thought it was illegal for goalkeepers to come off their lines before the ball was kicked.

nocky (Wexford) - Posts: 2059 - 15/01/2010 15:15:27    533930

nocky

Most ridiculous post I have ever seen on HS. Are you seriously suggesting that a goal from a penalty should be worth SIX points??? Are you trying to encourage players to dive in the box/"manufacture" penalties?[/i]

Absolutely not, my reasons are already outlined above...look again!!!!

And please explain how bringing the ball closer to the goal favours the goalkeeper again? I also thought it was illegal for goalkeepers to come off their lines before the ball was kicked.

How many times have you seen a penalty re-taking in Gaelic because the goalkeeper came of his line ?.

Squid

15/01/2010 15:43:34 squidword County: Louth Posts: 1495 533971 nocky Most ridiculous post I have ever seen on HS. Are you seriously suggesting that a goal from a penalty should be worth SIX points??? Are you trying to encourage players to dive in the box/"manufacture" penalties? Absolutely not, my reasons are already outlined above...look again!!!! Well this is what you would be effectively doing. And please explain how bringing the ball closer to the goal favours the goalkeeper again? I also thought it was illegal for goalkeepers to come off their lines before the ball was kicked. How many times have you seen a penalty re-taking in Gaelic because the goalkeeper came of his line ?. Not very often, but perhaps it would be a good idea to more strictly enforce this rule. You still haven't explained how moving the ball closer to goal favours the goalkeeper either, if this were actually true maybe it would be a good idea to move the penalty spot out to the 20m line, where it is in hurling? One more thing... what new scoring system would you use, the old 2-6 meaning two goals and six points wouldn't work if one of those goals and one of the points came from penalties. You'd have to go for something like 1-1-1-5, and instead of adding up to 12points, it would be 17! Absolutely ridiculous idea, I can't believe you are actually serious. Nocky.

nocky (Wexford) - Posts: 2059 - 15/01/2010 16:02:45    534005

Are you seriously suggesting that a goal from a penalty should be worth SIX points??? Are you trying to encourage players to dive in the box/"manufacture" penalties? Absolutely not, my reasons are already outlined above...look again!!!! Well this is exactly what you would be effectively doing. And please explain how bringing the ball closer to the goal favours the goalkeeper again? I also thought it was illegal for goalkeepers to come off their lines before the ball was kicked. How many times have you seen a penalty re-taking in Gaelic because the goalkeeper came of his line ?. Not very often, but perhaps it would be a good idea to more strictly enforce this rule. You still haven't explained how moving the ball closer to goal favours the goalkeeper either, if this were actually true maybe it would be a good idea to move the penalty spot out to the 20m line, where it is in hurling? One more thing... what new scoring system would you use, the old 2-6 meaning two goals and six points wouldn't work if one of those goals and one of the points came from penalties. You'd have to go for something like 1-1-1-5, and instead of adding up to 12points, it would be 17!

nocky (Wexford) - Posts: 2059 - 15/01/2010 17:35:11    534121

nocky
County: Wexford
Posts: 1097

533930 15/01/2010 13:35:21
squidword
County: Louth
Posts: 1493

533803
Jinxie,

I'd still prefer the 6 and 3 format. With regard to the backs and tackling as long as they tackle within the rules then they should have no worries about tackling. I believe the adoption this would help to insure that a player coming in on goal was not fouled deliberately (takin out of it)so as to prevent them from scoring a goal (3 points). Furthermore I could see a concept such as this adding further spice to our game of football.

nocky

Bringing the ball forward 2 mts IMO favours the goal keeper. Particularly when you have someone 6'4" between the uprights who stands 2 mts of his goal line.

Squid
_________________


And please explain how bringing the ball closer to the goal favours the goalkeeper again? I also thought it was illegal for goalkeepers to come off their lines before the ball was kicked.

would agree with squid on this, think 2 metre closer would definitly narrow the angle a lot for the Keper, especially as the movement rule is not enforced

dhorse (Laois) - Posts: 11374 - 15/01/2010 17:55:16    534168