(Oldest Posts First) - Go To The Latest Post
Jesus Master, it is going to be a long year if you keep this up. MuckrossHead (Donegal) - Posts: 5028 - 11/02/2013 20:26:22 1332384 Link 0 |
Obvious peno. Beelzedub (Dublin) - Posts: 480 - 11/02/2013 21:02:46 1332408 Link 0 |
Hi guys, emmetryan (Dublin) - Posts: 154 - 11/02/2013 21:59:13 1332436 Link 0 |
MuckrossHead Culann (Dublin) - Posts: 2306 - 12/02/2013 08:50:29 1332442 Link 0 |
If in doubt didn't put a cent on you going down, and only lost fiver first week, but got it back this with dub, kildare, meath, cavan, Westmeath accum let's just say i didn't go to work yesterday, royaldunne (Meath) - Posts: 19449 - 12/02/2013 09:31:18 1332465 Link 0 |
No wonder the country is in ruins. Jack_Sparrow (Westmeath) - Posts: 1046 - 12/02/2013 10:08:03 1332477 Link 0 |
The master jono (Mayo) - Posts: 350 - 12/02/2013 10:17:08 1332486 Link 0 |
Tyronetim, you say I am dismissing what everyone is saying, are you not doing the same? May I ask, where was the ball in this picture? Already gone past the post perhaps? The fact is he took the shot before he collided with the keeper and before Higgins got a hand on him. The shot had been taken. Obviously there is going to be a collision afterwards. Why do we have to go off this still image alone? Surely the live play is the best thing to go off? Tyronetim (Tyrone) - Posts: 1254 - 12/02/2013 10:28:38 1332491 Link 0 |
Beelzedub, if you read the posts you would see that I never once said it was an excuse. At no point did I say mayo should have won, in fact I stated multiple times that tyrone deserved to win. I made the point that the ref had a bad game. Your point was that the goalkeeper colliding with him had some part in the 'foul'. The goalkeeper was trying to make a save, the guy miss-kicked the ball wide so clearly he was never going to get a touch on it. Had the shot been on target he might well have. However, whether it was on target or not should not influence whether the keeper fouled the guy or not, he was protecting his goal, and he did that. do you suggest he should get out of his way? That is like saying that when bernard brogan missed his 1 on 1 last year against the same keeper, he could have gone down for a foul afterwards. As regards higgins' involvement, he put 1 hand towards the ball when the guy went to shoot, the shot went in and it went wide, there was a collision afterwards between the 3 of them. If that is a foul then why isnt there a foul every time 2 players collide in the middle of the field? It is a very soft penalty at best. But anyway, not to worry, here's hoping mayo get a similar one in their favour come the 2nd of March, I have a feeling we would be hearing a different story if that were to happen. The difference is Beelzedub, if it were to happen on that occasion, I would say the same as I say now. TheMaster (Mayo) - Posts: 16187 - 12/02/2013 10:37:18 1332498 Link 0 |
jono cacsmckilly (Tyrone) - Posts: 1294 - 12/02/2013 10:40:01 1332500 Link 0 |
Lads The Master wrecks my head aswell when I see him coming in on a debate I usually just stop posting but on the peno I agree with him for me it was never a peno. I've watched it loads of times and for me Donnelly makes a meal of it. clondalkindub (Dublin) - Posts: 9926 - 12/02/2013 10:41:46 1332502 Link 0 |
The TV pictures are nowhere near good enough to make a judgement. The ref was a lot closer and made the call. End of. MuckrossHead (Donegal) - Posts: 5028 - 12/02/2013 11:03:00 1332514 Link 0 |
Muckross, if you had lost the AI final on that incident would you be so quick to dismiss it? Can you not see that it is relevant to every team? Im not really bothered about the loss, not much can be learned from the game, it is very early, the conditions were terrible and our side was quite experimental. I was actually half expecting a loss or a draw if Im honest. My issue is with the ref making that call. You say he was in a good position but he was over 40 yards away when the long ball went in so I dont see how you can make that claim. People are saying the previous 2 mayo frees were not fouls, and I dont think they were either, yet there was more deliberate contact in the 2nd of those than there was in for the penalty. You cant have it every way. The point is I dont believe the ref could have been sure it was a penalty, because hand on heart I dont think anyone can honestly say that they know it was for sure, and we have been able to watch it over and over. He was 40 odd yards away trying to catch up with the long ball in, no way did he see enough of it, and frankly we are only fooling ourselves if we believe he did. I dont think you can give a penalty if you are not sure, do you muckross? We seen afterwards that the ref gave mayo a chance to level it, even though time should probably have been up, I think he done this because he wasnt sure and was trying to even it up, and that is something I dislike in the gaa; refs influencing the game to cover their own backsides. If there is a doubt in his head then he shouldnt be giving the decision in the first place, so this covering tactic that is all too prevalent in the gaa shouldnt be required. If it turns out that he got it wrong well then come out and say look Im sorry but I couldnt see it at the time. I dont think anyone would hold a grudge if that were the case. TheMaster (Mayo) - Posts: 16187 - 12/02/2013 12:04:10 1332561 Link 0 |
Beelzedub (Dublin) - Posts: 480 - 12/02/2013 12:07:26 1332568 Link 0 |
royaldunne if_in_doubt (Kildare) - Posts: 3692 - 12/02/2013 12:08:56 1332573 Link 0 |
Master, MuckrossHead (Donegal) - Posts: 5028 - 12/02/2013 12:20:53 1332583 Link 0 |
Master its time to park it there. You didn't hear any excuses from James Horan afterwards. The better team won. We also got two very soft free's to go two points up just before the penalty - swings and roundabouts. Move on and hopefully the team will learn something from the defeat. yew_tree (Mayo) - Posts: 11691 - 12/02/2013 12:40:41 1332597 Link 0 |
You didn't hear any excuses from James Horan afterwards Beelzedub (Dublin) - Posts: 480 - 12/02/2013 12:45:01 1332601 Link 0 |
But he wasnt in a better position muckross... TheMaster (Mayo) - Posts: 16187 - 12/02/2013 12:54:15 1332611 Link 0 |
He was in a better position. If he was 40 yards away as you say then that still makes him 100 yards closer than the tv cameras. MuckrossHead (Donegal) - Posts: 5028 - 12/02/2013 13:04:07 1332624 Link 0 |