(Oldest Posts First) - Go To The Latest Post
Gammy Knee and PP if you pair of lads can not look at this issue and apportion blame where it lies I am afraid any little bit of respect you may have had on this board will vanish with your crude attempts to tell us that this was the fault of the parents who I am sure with greatheart break had to make the decisions that were forced upon them. You can only adopt your stance for one of two reasons derryman (Derry) - Posts: 3246 - 11/09/2011 14:46:50 1031691 Link 0 |
derryman Gammy_Knee (USA) - Posts: 1482 - 11/09/2011 15:47:44 1031727 Link 0 |
Greengrass Gammy_Knee (USA) - Posts: 1482 - 11/09/2011 15:55:14 1031733 Link 0 |
You know you have the better of them when they must resort to swearing and petty insults. Open your eyes and try to see the situation from a different perspective Derryman than that of the narrow minded Repuplican pplocal (Tyrone) - Posts: 5878 - 11/09/2011 16:11:37 1031741 Link 0 |
Well I am not a republican. But I do know from a simple cursory glance at history that faliure to oppose this intimidation head on and struggle for what is right is tantamount to accepting that you will remain in the place your antagoniser has deemed your proper place in his/her world. I have acknowledged the terrible choice that was forced upon the parents of these children and what you pair of boys are saying is that the parents must accept guilt because they were forced into a situation that was beyond their control. Had they accepted the bullies position how long do you think it would have taken for a similar blockade to happen elswhere. Was as said before Rosa Parkes and Nelson Mandela even Mahatma Ghandi also "narrow minded republicans" because they took a stand for what is right, I think not. derryman (Derry) - Posts: 3246 - 11/09/2011 18:22:52 1031836 Link 0 |
Yes, in time those Ardoyne residents will go down in history along Gandhi, Parks and Mandela. Jesus wept. We're going round in circles here so I'll reiterate my main point, for any parent the safety of their child should be their number 1 concern. It's easy to say it here but would you tell the parent of one of those children that they were a coward for taking their kid the safer route to school? I highly doubt it pplocal (Tyrone) - Posts: 5878 - 11/09/2011 18:53:55 1031872 Link 0 |
pplocal Greengrass (Louth) - Posts: 6181 - 11/09/2011 19:16:44 1031900 Link 0 |
Right from the start the cops should have cleared the Ardoyne Road of the hate filled UDA crowd and their hangers on AND arrested many of the Loyalist residents who were screaming obscenities, abuse and threats; that would have made the route safer. The danger was that the so called authorities allowed these vermin so close to the kids and families and NOT that these people were going to scholl by that route; they always did. People should remember that the lower Shankill UDA were involved in interface pogroms and attacks right across Belfast at this time and the Holy Cross issue was a further attempt to inflict their sectarian violence on innocent Catholic schoolchildren. As I say pp and gammy don't know or want to know the facts. Ulsterman (Antrim) - Posts: 9819 - 11/09/2011 19:17:20 1031901 Link 0 |
So PP you need historians and commentators to tell you who to admire, you have to actually read a text book to see when someone is standing up for what is right. and you believe that only those people who are recognised in history are be capable of being brave in the face of extreme persecution and worthy of admiration . I am different I see little unrecognised people struggle daily for the greater good of mankind. And I would not tell those parents who chose a different route they were cowards they made a very hard choice also which should never have been forced upon them either. I would however tell those who chose to run the blockade that they were very brave and I admire them greatly. Because I know they would have antagonised over their decision constantly and their resolve in the face of such adversity is to be recommended and it would be fitting to recognise that no Parent was faced with an easy choice in this matter. From my own experience as a parent I can imagine that this put great stress upon the relationships of every set of parents involved I am sure that some parents whose children took the alternative route felt they were not showing solidarity as they perhaps could have while other parents whose children took the proper route felt that they were indeed putting their children at risk. Have you considered that had no parent and child took the bullies to task what the outcome might have been. derryman (Derry) - Posts: 3246 - 11/09/2011 19:24:52 1031915 Link 0 |
Again you're putting words in my mouth with that opening sentence. I'm all for the little people facing up to their daily struggles, in this case however these parents were not. I have no doubt that if they hadn't taken the bullies to task (by that you mean screaming at the protesters) the outcome would have been the same, the protest would have simply petered out as it did. As a parent would you yourself take a stand when it meant your child had to face that kind of abuse? Genuine question pplocal (Tyrone) - Posts: 5878 - 11/09/2011 20:20:05 1032002 Link 0 |