(Oldest Posts First) - Go To The Latest Post
|
Agreeing with your assessment of the british military ta32.Maybe I might have missed something? seanie_boy (Tyrone) - Posts: 4235 - 14/08/2010 20:21:24 746250 Link 0 |
|
seanie boy. ta32 (Tyrone) - Posts: 4907 - 14/08/2010 20:38:56 746259 Link 0 |
|
seanie_boy (Tyrone) - Posts: 4235 - 15/08/2010 09:40:02 746311 Link 0 |
|
In an idealistic world, yes. I'd love to have a united Ireland but I doubt it will ever happen. Sico_Squrial (Limerick) - Posts: 39 - 15/08/2010 15:59:20 746445 Link 0 |
|
John Hume used to say that Unionists were very good at telling us what they were against BUT not so good at telling us what they are for. To be honest I don't think they know what they are and consequently are very insecure. At the northern end of the new Newry road Unionists/Loyalists have festooned lights and lamposts with Union Jacks, Orange Order flags, Loyalist paramiltary flags, Scottish saltire, etc. It is the most pathetic thing one could see and shouts out "WE ARE VERY INSECURE" at everyone. To a certain extent Northern Nationalists are a wee bit insecure because there is still a feeling that the South sold them out in 1921 and 1969 but Northern Catholics know they are Irish, probably more so than any of the other 3 provinces. If ANYONE has the righ to use the term 'original Irish' it is the province of Ulster where the language, religion, rebellion against colonialism and the music ALL have their roots. Ulsterman (Antrim) - Posts: 9840 - 15/08/2010 17:49:25 746528 Link 0 |
|
bad.monkey artisan (Down) - Posts: 1795 - 15/08/2010 17:55:55 746533 Link 0 |
|
This is hardly a debate to see has the right to say they're more Irish than the next. Were all born or raised in Ireland, North and South. Sico_Squrial (Limerick) - Posts: 39 - 15/08/2010 18:18:32 746547 Link 0 |
|
I agree totally sico I was just using this to counteract the nonsense that some foolish people on HS spout that Ulster people are not Irish. That is the most factually and historically incorrect nonsense that anyone could say and demonstrates a real lack of knowledge about this island. Ulsterman (Antrim) - Posts: 9840 - 15/08/2010 18:50:01 746565 Link 0 |
|
Ireland, north and south should definitely be united...... under British rule, like the glory days pre 1921!!!! Pedrito (Dublin) - Posts: 1111 - 16/08/2010 14:00:29 747084 Link 0 |
|
So do you think everyone in the Republic in the midst of a recession would be happy to give 10% of their wages to incorporate N.I.? I read a report that it would cost every man, woman and child in the Republic £2000 a year each to accommodate N.I., do you think everyone would be fine with that? Goodfella, Tir (None) - Posts: 1652 - 16/08/2010 14:39:39 747132 Link 0 |
|
seanie_boy (Tyrone) - Posts: 4235 - 16/08/2010 19:18:50 747528 Link 0 |
|
Goodfella, Tir Scruffy2Donut (Cavan) - Posts: 1112 - 16/08/2010 19:53:21 747578 Link 0 |
|
'I'm not an economist but I do believe two seperate economies on a small island makes very little sense.' pplocal (Tyrone) - Posts: 5878 - 16/08/2010 20:16:11 747597 Link 0 |
|
PomeroyPlunkett hurlinspuds (Cork) - Posts: 1494 - 16/08/2010 20:45:02 747628 Link 0 |
|
'Having said all this, I honestly believe that Pomeroy, as he has gone on record as saying, is motivated solely by money so if he believes he'll be out of pocket by reunifying his country then I believe him' pplocal (Tyrone) - Posts: 5878 - 17/08/2010 13:16:32 748045 Link 0 |
|
The North would dominate completely! Bigapple (Kerry) - Posts: 495 - 17/08/2010 15:46:45 748313 Link 0 |
|
You're not really operating 2 separate economies on a small island since one of those economies is intrinsically tied to and significantly propped up by a very large economy across the water. Corrxxx (Kerry) - Posts: 584 - 17/08/2010 15:50:11 748323 Link 0 |
|
'Most people dont have a £100 to put towards it and they're not being tight or money orientated.' pplocal (Tyrone) - Posts: 5878 - 17/08/2010 16:16:40 748398 Link 0 |
|
pomeroy, you deride me for commenting on your posts but you're allowed to - you just misquoted me. I also like to refer back to the fact that I resorted to name calling, I've tried to argue the point, something I expect everyone to do yet you have called me both ignorant and stupid. I'd prefer to stick to my methods than resort to that. How about answering the points in my previous post regarding economics. hurlinspuds (Cork) - Posts: 1494 - 17/08/2010 17:30:12 748533 Link 0 |
|
I'm not deriding you for commenting on my posts, in a debate that's to be expected. I'm deriding you for the rather odd behaviour of constantly summarising what I have said and then saying this is what Pomeroy thinks. People are more than capable of reading my posts and getting my point of view without you repeating it pplocal (Tyrone) - Posts: 5878 - 17/08/2010 18:22:42 748583 Link 0 |