(Oldest Posts First) - Go To The Latest Post
this type of behaviour towards a referee is just not on. Appeals might see a reduction for someone who did not have a history. Alas this is not the case here. Sparrowhawk (Tyrone) - Posts: 107 - 17/06/2008 23:22:56 34097 Link 0 |
Six months isn't enough?!? Are you mad? Estragon (Armagh) - Posts: 19 - 17/06/2008 23:47:03 34105 Link 0 |
What a mockery the GAA have made out of themselves. The ban handed down to Paul Galvin is nothing short of disgraceful. 6 months for knocking a notebook to the floor and remonstrating with the linesman...it's beyond belief that this has actually happened. Maroonie (Westmeath) - Posts: 105 - 18/06/2008 05:26:24 34125 Link 0 |
Well most posters on this thread should be happy now especially posters from Dublin and Meath and others who didn't like Galvin in the first place. chainsaw (Laois) - Posts: 712 - 18/06/2008 08:47:01 34135 Link 0 |
he didnt just slap a notebook. he got sent off before any of that and then he assaulted the referee (you cannot touch the man in black),preceeded to verbally abuse the referee(minimun for that is a month,depending on the referees report.)now refusing to leave the field is another no-no.Also abusing the referee and his co-workers is alot like striking.one month for a strike but if you run 20yards to strike your up the creek. all in all i think its a fair ban and one if paul appeals i still hope he gets at least 3months. Rhodejim (Offaly) - Posts: 2888 - 18/06/2008 09:03:45 34139 Link 0 |
Dubs---will ye lighten up a bit!! Can ye not take a joke!! tiobraid (Tipperary) - Posts: 4119 - 18/06/2008 09:39:02 34149 Link 0 |
Carl Jung speaks of assault, intimidation and confrontation with an official and believes it has a place in our games all because the lad loves his football. Snufalufagus (Dublin) - Posts: 8100 - 18/06/2008 09:50:50 34153 Link 0 |
18/06/2008 09:50:50 RMDrive (Donegal) - Posts: 2202 - 18/06/2008 10:02:40 34160 Link 0 |
Dubs---will ye lighten up a bit!! Can ye not take a joke!! JayoCluxton (Dublin) - Posts: 2688 - 18/06/2008 10:04:28 34161 Link 0 |
Boo-Hoo! Snufalufagus (Dublin) - Posts: 8100 - 18/06/2008 10:06:35 34166 Link 0 |
Lads you are all going on about the panel on the Sunday Game not condeming Galvin's actions ....... WHY WOULD THEY? Lads it was the smallest of infringments, and with regards to the abuse to the other official, this is a regular occurence even at underage football. Some of ye are not living in the real world! Galvin deserves a smack on the wrist but far worse has gone un-punished in the past from other players! MnMennamin's actions on Cooper in 05 and was not even booked! Dublin Tyrone (20 man brawl) a few players got a couple of week bans and only missed meaningless NFL games! Dublin Meath, Whelan's infraction with a Meath player and got a couple of weeks and missed meaningless Dublin games, this should not of been met with a ban but a jail sentence! Mattie Forde, last yr right in front of the Ref an only got a ban due to video footage, what a joke! The CCC is so inconsistent that they are making the GAA disiplinary system a joke! Galvin did wrong, no doubt about it! But referee's are harshly and unfairly penialising him for nothin fouls where as if he was playing for a northern county he would only be doing what they all do and no doubt getting away with it! Ciarrai Abu (Overseas) - Posts: 1050 - 18/06/2008 10:09:25 34168 Link 0 |
What a muppet!! sean og (Armagh) - Posts: 1073 - 18/06/2008 10:12:08 34170 Link 0 |
No need to bring his profession into it, I think that's been said before. 6 months is too harsh, I think even the CCC realise this. They're giving themselves some lee-way when it comes to the appeals. It'll go down to 3 months. 3inarow08 (Kerry) - Posts: 2455 - 18/06/2008 10:19:53 34177 Link 0 |
Snuff - have you had a bang on the head in recent weeks? If RTE are ever gonna do a version of Grumpy Old Men you are a shoe-in - and E Dunphy. JayoCluxton (Dublin) - Posts: 2688 - 18/06/2008 10:29:21 34183 Link 0 |
chainsaw redandgreen (None) - Posts: 691 - 18/06/2008 10:29:47 34184 Link 0 |
I notice that the general consensus in regards Galvin's punishment is that he should only have received 3 months. This can still be the case, the CCCC have recommended 6 months as they believe, based on the evidence provided not to mention the referee's report, that Galvin's offence was worse than the minimum sanction for the jostling, putting a hand on or minimal interference with a referee. Galvin can still appeal and if this doesn't get over turned by the CHC, then he can bring it ot the CAC and then the DRA if needs be. However, considering the result for the Meath players when they took it this far, this doesn't look good for Galvin. holymoly (Dublin) - Posts: 757 - 18/06/2008 10:34:04 34187 Link 0 |
Great post Holymoly. 3inarow08 (Kerry) - Posts: 2455 - 18/06/2008 10:45:12 34197 Link 0 |
Alot of people giving out about 6 months being too much.... but look at it this way - look at all the off the ball stuff he's got away with over the years, maybe this is his karma... vice99 (Donegal) - Posts: 1054 - 18/06/2008 10:45:32 34198 Link 0 |
Snuf's account has been taken over by his nemesis "I-can't-believe-its-not-the-real-Joe-Joe" and his is trying to portray Snuf as a grumpy, complaining, angry old fecker. Doing a pretty good job too :) RMDrive (Donegal) - Posts: 2202 - 18/06/2008 10:45:53 34199 Link 0 |
The CCCC this week handed down a 96 weeks suspension to a Meath Club player for an incident with a ref some weeks ago. Looks like Galvin is getting off lightly by these standards. GG got 48 weeks for the exact same thing a few years ago in a club game. After several appeals he eventually got the ban down to 32 weeks. Diego (Meath) - Posts: 1205 - 18/06/2008 10:49:40 34203 Link 0 |