(Oldest Posts First) - Go To The Latest Post
Cavan_Slasher paddyogall (Mayo) - Posts: 5110 - 16/12/2009 21:02:14 515964 Link 0 |
I am a public sector worker, and I would like to think that I do a good honest job. I feel really hurt at the ire directed towards me and my colleagues over the past few months from people across the private sector. These same people cannot see the divide and conquer policy being driven by the government and the Indo and are swallowing it hook, line and sinker, but then what would you expect, it was the same insightful people who probably re-elected Fianna Failure to power. gaillimh73 (Galway) - Posts: 669 - 16/12/2009 22:20:02 516072 Link 0 |
Gaillimh73/Cavan Slasher, I have no doubt that you do your jobs well, as many others in the public sector do. But can you honestly tell me when you look around your place of work that everyone there is working at full capacity, giving 100%? I know many people working in the public sector and their work ethic wouldn't allow them to mess about all week. However, they get pretty annoyed that there are a number of people there just for the paycheck and do as little as possible. Now I'm very aware of the services provided by the Gardai, fire brigade etc. and the need for them, no qualmns with them. But the civil service as a whole is completely inefficient and bleeding money. The government needs to cut expenditure (arising from their own incompetence). As they can't go and cut 10-20% of the workforce, they need to cut elsewhere. So everyone takes a small hit rather than many people taking a full hit. Now the government got us into this position, no doubt. Bertie constantly bowing to the Union's demands meant that the civil service has been running inefficiently for years. The only way I can really see things getting better is for the government to sell off some of it's substantial assets (selling the DAA, Cork and Shannon airports would raise billions, sell it's stake in Aer Lingus, CIE, An Post). This way these services will be cut from government spending as well as resulting in huge income inflows to help deal with the deficit. It might even make some of them run efficiently! I can't see them doing this any time soon though, so I'm afraid the pay cuts are going to have to come into effect as the country cannot continue to lose the money it's losing. There are people say in town planning etc, the property bubble has well and truely burst, yet they are still in jobs with sweet f.a. to do. If this kind of inefficiency was erradicated, it would go a long way to making the savings that are undoubtedly needed. Just my view though. Bermuda_Bomber (Meath) - Posts: 101 - 17/12/2009 01:59:16 516229 Link 0 |
paddyogall chainsaw (Laois) - Posts: 712 - 17/12/2009 12:51:02 516413 Link 0 |
Chainsaw: Hag_and_Cheese (Tipperary) - Posts: 6103 - 17/12/2009 14:03:49 516484 Link 0 |
Hag & Cheese, wages are still higher in the Public Sector !! Oh no there not, not now !! Who told you that ? Cavan_Slasher (Cavan) - Posts: 10253 - 17/12/2009 18:46:43 516703 Link 0 |
Bermuda Bomber, As i have said all along the people who we need to get rid of are in middle management. It is top-heavy with them and many of them are not needed. That is where i would start. If you submit a report in the H.S.E. it would be read by about ten of these people and each would contribute their own wee bit as they feel they have to have an opinion on the matter. When you would eventually get it back it would be totally confusing and bear no relevance to the original thus creating frustration and confusion to the people who actually work at the coalface !! All little Hitlers trying to outdo one another and the ordinary workers suffer as do the public !! Cavan_Slasher (Cavan) - Posts: 10253 - 17/12/2009 19:02:17 516716 Link 0 |
16/12/2009 21:02:14 ruanua (Donegal) - Posts: 4966 - 17/12/2009 19:49:10 516796 Link 0 |
They are higher per equivalent job see the benchmarking report and the was 2007 so they are higher now seen there has been a 20% drop in pay in the private sector and that dosen't include the 200,000 odd 100% pay cuts. Most of the wealth in the private sector is in the top management i.e exec's so how can you compare wages across the board then!!!! you seem to neglect to mention that. Hag_and_Cheese (Tipperary) - Posts: 6103 - 17/12/2009 22:20:02 517003 Link 0 |
"As i have said all along the people who we need to get rid of are in middle management" so you agree there should be cuts then?? Their can't be jobs cuts so pay cuts need to be made!! It's a simple fact pay cuts or job cuts and there's going to be protest either way. All protest but no solutions offered. Hag_and_Cheese (Tipperary) - Posts: 6103 - 17/12/2009 22:25:57 517023 Link 0 |
Hag & Cheese, 7.5 % pension levy, 2 % health levy, 5 % pay cut, 6 % pay rise which was reneged on and 1 % some other levy i can't remember !! If everyone else can count their "denied" pay rise so can I !! Cavan_Slasher (Cavan) - Posts: 10253 - 17/12/2009 22:43:38 517058 Link 0 |
Hag & Cheese, the solution was higher taxes as then everyone pays and nobody can complain !! The very rich are still exempt !! Cavan_Slasher (Cavan) - Posts: 10253 - 17/12/2009 22:46:27 517071 Link 0 |
most taxes are on a par most developed economies the low tax bracket public sector pay isn't add to this low corporate tax so that massively effects tax takes, right when everyone is working there's a trade off on the corporate tax losses but 400000 unemployed means they can't afford such an expensive public service. Again the private sector has taking paycuts and massive job losses but the public sector do not want this at all you can't have your cake and eat it The the majority of the private sector has taken the double hit you complaining about. Scandanavians have higher tax rates but they actually have effective public service worth the money again not a personal attack you generalise so i'll do a bit too. Hag_and_Cheese (Tipperary) - Posts: 6103 - 17/12/2009 23:47:48 517199 Link 0 |
7.5 % pension levy, 2 % health levy (pension and health benefits that most people don't get), 6 % pay rise (pay freeze if not cuts implemented in the vast majority of private sector june 2008). If the public sector took the risks job wise as the private sector then i wouldn't agree with the pay cuts (as basically there would have been a cull of numbers). Job for life state pension. Example of this is contract work pays more as they don't have any benefits and no security. You seem to be highlighting the top earners by 5-10% of the private sector at least my argurment deals with the whole public sector. Hag_and_Cheese (Tipperary) - Posts: 6103 - 17/12/2009 23:59:36 517215 Link 0 |
Hag & Cheese, their pensions were "gambled" for greedy purposes by bankers and investors now you cannot blame the Public Sector for that !! Our cuts are exactly in line or even worse than in the Private Sector i believe. I know my wages are down about 21 % on what i would have expected to earn in 2010. Many have retired or have left the Public Sector so it will diminish with time. Did you expect the to leave in sympathy with people who have lost their jobs, thats not the way life works. People joined the Public Sector for security, people joined the Private Sector to become rich !! Many of them did !! Cavan_Slasher (Cavan) - Posts: 10253 - 18/12/2009 15:15:02 517681 Link 0 |
18/12/2009 15:15:02 ruanua (Donegal) - Posts: 4966 - 18/12/2009 15:27:57 517711 Link 0 |
Public sector are useless, about time they got cuts, more needs to be done about their pensions though, more cuts needed. Cranky360 (Mayo) - Posts: 834 - 18/12/2009 15:56:49 517747 Link 0 |
Good man Cranky, you are so intelligent !! Cavan_Slasher (Cavan) - Posts: 10253 - 18/12/2009 18:05:17 517881 Link 0 |