(Oldest Posts First) - Go To The Latest Post
My own take: any hint of verbal abuse or physical abuse from players or coaching staff toward a referree or official = straight red card and fixed-penalty ban. This has to be stamped out of the game. Period. No ifs or buts. Other laws should come in for mass brawls etc. Young_gael (Meath) - Posts: 597 - 06/03/2023 18:34:15 2462412 Link 1 |
My tuppence worth for what it's worth..why is there a total lack of respect from players towards officials..free against them they give out..if a ref is booking them they don't listen,they are pointing at other things or nothing at someone.ive seen players walking away while being booked.i watched matches at weekend and over the past few weekends in both hurling and football and have noticed it a lot more..managers on sidelines then giving out to linesman and fourth official..I also agree on the rules situation,no one seems to know and they seem to change week to week..am I being over critical??interesting to even hear whelan and cooper saying players wouldn't know the rules and definitely wouldn't read up on the rules.. CTGAA10 (Limerick) - Posts: 2506 - 06/03/2023 20:11:12 2462433 Link 0 |
Yes like a team manager can talk to a referee, you can speak to a mechanic who does a bad job but the whole town doesnt need to stand outside the garage shouting abuse at him while you do it. It seems some people can not actually watch a match without shouting abuse. Pretty pathetic. bad.monkey (USA) - Posts: 4649 - 06/03/2023 20:40:58 2462435 Link 0 |
a ref isnt paid that much. By going down the line of "what about the poor standards of refereeing" shows the problems we have Officials can be poor and will make mistakes and talking about club level, age grade games dont get anywhere near enough training, support and guidance But Paudie Clifford wasnt correct. Even if the ref was poor. there can be right ways to bring that to light and where and how he did it wasnt the place. KillingFields (Limerick) - Posts: 3755 - 06/03/2023 21:30:56 2462442 Link 6 |
Continually changing rules isnt a problem. Look at rugby and how much the laws of rugby can change season to season except in rugby the referees are coached far better, assisted far more and respect in general is far better.
KillingFields (Limerick) - Posts: 3755 - 06/03/2023 21:32:17 2462444 Link 1 |
I'll take the stats at face value, but you're interpreting them a bit unusually. I'm referring to incidents of physical abuse versus verbal abuse, which would we a much smaller ratio than 1 to 4. Verbal abuse of ref occurs on multiple occasions at almost every match played. Physical abuse is far rarer thankfully. The vast majority of the thousands of people who verbally abuse refs regularly throughout the year would never and never have laid a finger on a ref. As thick as they are for verbally abusing a ref, they're not that thick or unhinged. A person capable of assaulting a ref is linked to that individual's personality and behaviour traits. I don't see it as a natural evolution from verbal abuse at all. WanPintWin (Galway) - Posts: 2318 - 06/03/2023 21:54:02 2462448 Link 1 |
How exactly are you defining the difference between giving out to, or about, the ref from the stands, and actual verbal abuse? Where is the line?
Viking66 (Wexford) - Posts: 15672 - 07/03/2023 08:02:46 2462451 Link 0 |
It is a problem when the rules are applied in different ways by different referees…. You are correct in saying that in rugby referees are coached better and assisted better…. At inter county a ref has 6 assistants who never seem to see anything… just 2 on field in rugby to help… Respect has to be earned
ForeverBlue2 (Cavan) - Posts: 3814 - 07/03/2023 09:23:12 2462458 Link 0 |
Sorry, I'm not a stats person at all so if I misunderstand them that's on me. I'm trying to get across that I don't think physical abuse happens in a vacuum, I thought those stats backed that up but as I say, not a stats person at all! I'd say my use of the words "natural next step" from verbal is physical or whatever I said, is probably OTT in my first post as well. I just think there is a sliding scale in terms of the abuse and I don't think the physical abuse happens as often as 1 in 4 in that research, if the verbal abuse isn't happening at such a high level CCFabu (Donegal) - Posts: 163 - 07/03/2023 09:49:34 2462463 Link 0 |
"Ara come on ref" "how did you miss that" "go to specsavers ref" etc etc, vanilla stuff like that, it's shouting it's making noise it's building pressure, but it's nothing abusive. Calling a ref all the names under the sun and sustaining that throughout the match, getting personal and vindictive, that's verbal abuse. We know the difference with the infamous sledging stuff as well. A defender poking at a forward for missing a free and saying a sub is warming up because he's coming off is one thing. Going on about that forwards sister or mother or whatever else, is a whole other level. Everyone knows where the line is, they just like to pretend they don't. CCFabu (Donegal) - Posts: 163 - 07/03/2023 09:53:37 2462464 Link 0 |
Agreed bringing someone's family into any abuse is definitely beyond any line. As would be comments about their gender, bodyshape , colour etc. And most obviously any threats. But I guess what I'm asking is in that survey do refs who say they suffered verbal abuse include remarks like "ah ref you should've gone to specsavers" or "ah ref is there only 1 arm working on you today" etc? Viking66 (Wexford) - Posts: 15672 - 07/03/2023 10:06:54 2462467 Link 1 |
I just looked at the research paper (it's open access if you go to the Dr Noel Brick twitter account there is a link there) and this is the definition: "Officials were asked to consider verbal abuse as including, "intimidation, threats of harm, swearing, coercion, harassment, or humiliation" and physical abuse as including, "assault, hitting, punching, slapping, kicking, pushing, head-butting, hair-pulling, or biting". Importantly, participants were asked to respond based on what they considered to be verbal or physical abuse directed toward them. As such, participants answered whether they had experienced these forms of abuse (Yes = 1, No = 2), how frequently they had experienced each form (Every Game = 1, Every Couple of Games = 2, A Couple of Times a Season = 3, Every Few Years = 4, Once or Twice in My Officiating Career = 5), and who they experienced abuse from (selecting any from players, team management or coaches, support staff, club officials, spectators, and others)." I think the key point there is that they were asked to respond based on what they considered to be verbal or physical abuse. I would be surprised if many refs would be categorising the vanilla stuff you hear at every game as verbal abuse but it is a personal thing as to what the ref feels is abusive themselves I suppose. CCFabu (Donegal) - Posts: 163 - 07/03/2023 10:44:17 2462480 Link 0 |
The fact a fella is on here posting that a ref "needing to be escorted off the pitch" is a problem with the refs performance says a lot. No matter how absolutely fecking awful a refereeing performance might be, there is no situation where they should need escorted off a pitch for gods sake. Nothing justifies some of that sort of behaviour from so-called supporters. CCFabu (Donegal) - Posts: 163 - 07/03/2023 10:51:07 2462483 Link 0 |
I have came across referees who made a genuine mistake and put a score down on his notebook for the wrong team but when challenged ( with both teams agreeing ) he refused to change it…. How could someone like that deserve respect… A lot of them have a very high opinion of themselves and think they are above making errors ForeverBlue2 (Cavan) - Posts: 3814 - 07/03/2023 11:07:39 2462485 Link 1 |
So give him a round of applause and tell him he did a wonderful job… get a grip.. He needed escorting off because of the mess he made… Look at the mess Sludden made of the Leinster final when he denied Louth a genuine win.. Did you expect Louth supporters to clap him off… get a grip of yourself.. it's not a bit of wonder we are known as a nanny state…
ForeverBlue2 (Cavan) - Posts: 3814 - 07/03/2023 12:15:43 2462507 Link 0 |
No it isnt. Refs have to be able interpret rules differently. Many areas of game cant be refereed in exactly the same way every time because its just not possible At inter county these assistants to the ref arent trained enough. Going respect has to be earned is a cop out by those who dont want any improvements and see abuse as something that is acceptable. KillingFields (Limerick) - Posts: 3755 - 07/03/2023 13:24:30 2462525 Link 0 |
5 year bans minimum would help people focus I believe. sponger (Wicklow) - Posts: 2928 - 07/03/2023 13:25:09 2462527 Link 0 |
No I don't expect anyone to clap a ref off if they're angry at him or even if there's a huge sense of injustice or plain old wrong has been done because of a mistake from the ref but I'm sorry it's not being a "nanny state" to expect grown bloody adults to control their behaviour for gods sake. Grow the hell up will ya
CCFabu (Donegal) - Posts: 163 - 07/03/2023 13:33:20 2462531 Link 0 |
While I don't agree with Clifford calling out the Ref in his speech I do believe a referees performance should be open to discussion at some level after a game. But they also need far more input from their linesman and umpires.
Bon (Kildare) - Posts: 2308 - 07/03/2023 13:40:23 2462533 Link 0 |
No cop out …. Earn respect and you will get it.. No training means no good so it's poor by the GAA so..
ForeverBlue2 (Cavan) - Posts: 3814 - 07/03/2023 13:49:10 2462537 Link 0 |