National Forum

Steps And Throwing Passes- Whatever You're Having Yourself

(Oldest Posts First) - Go To The Latest Post


The liberal interpretation of two basic rules of Gaelic football is back for 2023. It's a near certainty that a forward with a sniff of a chance can go 7 or 8 steps past he man marker to get a shot away. And sure why bother striking a hand-pass when a throw is much safer?

Last weekend alone (and not an exhaustive list):
James Carr 7 or 8 steps for his goal for Mayo- but sure wasn't it a great shot all the same
P McBrearty- threw the hand pass to set up his winner, again a super finish
O'Sullivan threw Kerry's last point over the bar after about 8 steps- the classic 2-hander Kerry way
Shane Walsh took a mere 7 steps to get round the Cork corner back for Meath's opening goal
And Clare's winner against Louth was straight from a clean lift off the ground.

Would any of the referee's involved have made it out of the car park if they'd applied the law correctly? Sorting out these two would do much to sort out the scourge of packed defences

Eddie the Exile (Monaghan) - Posts: 1064 - 31/01/2023 21:12:37    2455693

Link

Replying To Eddie the Exile:  "The liberal interpretation of two basic rules of Gaelic football is back for 2023. It's a near certainty that a forward with a sniff of a chance can go 7 or 8 steps past he man marker to get a shot away. And sure why bother striking a hand-pass when a throw is much safer?

Last weekend alone (and not an exhaustive list):
James Carr 7 or 8 steps for his goal for Mayo- but sure wasn't it a great shot all the same
P McBrearty- threw the hand pass to set up his winner, again a super finish
O'Sullivan threw Kerry's last point over the bar after about 8 steps- the classic 2-hander Kerry way
Shane Walsh took a mere 7 steps to get round the Cork corner back for Meath's opening goal
And Clare's winner against Louth was straight from a clean lift off the ground.

Would any of the referee's involved have made it out of the car park if they'd applied the law correctly? Sorting out these two would do much to sort out the scourge of packed defences"
Well said

Fkd12 (Louth) - Posts: 150 - 01/02/2023 09:45:18    2455715

Link

With the steps now they should just officially make it 6. You won't be done for any less. Might as well make it official. The throw is definitely one that is creeping in more and more

thebronze14 (Donegal) - Posts: 42 - 01/02/2023 09:53:32    2455717

Link

Replying To thebronze14:  "With the steps now they should just officially make it 6. You won't be done for any less. Might as well make it official. The throw is definitely one that is creeping in more and more"
[url=]https://twitter.com/i/status/1620523086519869442

16 steps before passing and 12 steps for the scorer

ExiledCuCu (Cavan) - Posts: 228 - 01/02/2023 11:17:14    2455744

Link

It happens in almost every game, only gets highlighted when it's a big score in the bigger games buts it's common place.. there's a very big selective condemnation element to it and it's usually the poor forwards that get roasted the most

We've all done it to our advantage during play, most of the time it just happens so fast that you take an extra couple of steps to make the space and when you feel balanced enough to shoot

There would be an awful lot of frees if refs were to blow up for it more often, they'd also be huge calls late in games that would completely deflate the excitement of a game.

Refs are also a wee bit wary of blowing up for that reason imo.. it's definitely a major bubble burst call and there would be no consistency to it that would lead to huge frustrations and negative attention drawn to them

I think the steps should be extended, as it stands that rule might as well exist as it's such a common feature of the sport

The selective condemnation element is daft though, it goes against you one moment and with you the next

It's always the way, big calls balance themselves out

I don't blame the refs, they've a bloody hard job and I for one wouldn't want to do it.

jimbodub (Dublin) - Posts: 20601 - 01/02/2023 12:23:07    2455762

Link

I think they should get rid of the pick up and allow players pick the ball of the ground like ladies football. It's a good rule. They are not allowed dive on the ball or pick it up while lying on the ground but it speeds up the game. There is no skill whatsoever putting your toe to the ball to pick it up and most of the time they just pretending anyway and picking it straight off the ground. It would nt affect the great skill of flicking it up by the toe to hand either as if a player has that skill in his locker it's quicker to do it rather than bend down. The hurling was a joke a few years ago with all the throws but refs seem to have clamped down a bit.

CiarraiMick (Dublin) - Posts: 3678 - 01/02/2023 12:55:30    2455773

Link

This steps and throwing the hand pass is something I really hate too. And it is much much more present in division 1 and 2 teams than any others. It's crept in and is accepted now just in the way diving in soccer crept in and a guy can throw himself down for the smallest touch now

leitrim4sam (Leitrim) - Posts: 645 - 01/02/2023 13:17:06    2455783

Link

Replying To CiarraiMick:  "I think they should get rid of the pick up and allow players pick the ball of the ground like ladies football. It's a good rule. They are not allowed dive on the ball or pick it up while lying on the ground but it speeds up the game. There is no skill whatsoever putting your toe to the ball to pick it up and most of the time they just pretending anyway and picking it straight off the ground. It would nt affect the great skill of flicking it up by the toe to hand either as if a player has that skill in his locker it's quicker to do it rather than bend down. The hurling was a joke a few years ago with all the throws but refs seem to have clamped down a bit."
Seems a no brainer except maybe? from a player safety point of view. With a clean pick up the player can reach farther forward leaving their head area more exposed. There are a lot of these head knocks in ladies football

sligo joe (Dublin) - Posts: 685 - 01/02/2023 13:41:34    2455788

Link

Replying To CiarraiMick:  "I think they should get rid of the pick up and allow players pick the ball of the ground like ladies football. It's a good rule. They are not allowed dive on the ball or pick it up while lying on the ground but it speeds up the game. There is no skill whatsoever putting your toe to the ball to pick it up and most of the time they just pretending anyway and picking it straight off the ground. It would nt affect the great skill of flicking it up by the toe to hand either as if a player has that skill in his locker it's quicker to do it rather than bend down. The hurling was a joke a few years ago with all the throws but refs seem to have clamped down a bit."
Seems a no brainer except maybe? from a player safety point of view. With a clean pick up the player can reach farther forward leaving their head area more exposed. There are a lot of these head knocks in ladies football

sligo joe (Dublin) - Posts: 685 - 01/02/2023 13:42:42    2455789

Link

A good rule of thumb is what gets spectators and opposing players annoyed.

On that basis, a lot of the technical stuff including the hand pass in hurling, is fairly petty in my view. The difference between a legitimate hand pass and a throw is angels dancing on the head of pins territory in most cases.

The good refs in both codes know the difference between discretion and when someone is tearing the backside out of it. The bad ones are obsessed with come stuff to the detriment of the flow of games. There were a few of these in the O'Byrne games I saw. Which in one case actually contributed to players getting frustrated and a bit of handbags at the end.

BarneyGrant (Dublin) - Posts: 2584 - 01/02/2023 14:13:47    2455798

Link

The ironic thing is that you're far more likely to be done for overcarrying when not taking any steps at all.
We see all the time a lad with the ball gets bottled up, he has the ball for about 2 seconds while taking no steps and the ref blows a free against him, just as he gets the ball away.
With steps, players will get away with more if they're in the process of fending off an attempted tackle. The steps taken during the tussle seem to be not counted regularly.

WanPintWin (Galway) - Posts: 2050 - 01/02/2023 14:17:09    2455800

Link

Replying To WanPintWin:  "The ironic thing is that you're far more likely to be done for overcarrying when not taking any steps at all.
We see all the time a lad with the ball gets bottled up, he has the ball for about 2 seconds while taking no steps and the ref blows a free against him, just as he gets the ball away.
With steps, players will get away with more if they're in the process of fending off an attempted tackle. The steps taken during the tussle seem to be not counted regularly."
It really is 50/50 which way the ref will give the free in the scenario you made. It can be identical 20 seconds apart with reverse outcomes. By rule the only contact is shoulder to shoulder but the refs allow players to drape themselves all over the ball carrier. There's no rhyme or reason to the calls. Flip a coin.

cluichethar (Mayo) - Posts: 454 - 01/02/2023 14:50:07    2455808

Link

I see a new thing this last couple of years.When a player received a ball they used to take a hop or a solo but now a lot of them make an initial fast burst often taking a lot of steps.

gunman (Donegal) - Posts: 1060 - 01/02/2023 16:04:57    2455827

Link

Replying To gunman:  "I see a new thing this last couple of years.When a player received a ball they used to take a hop or a solo but now a lot of them make an initial fast burst often taking a lot of steps."
We are coaching the kids to use their 4 steps before hopping or soloing the ball.

Viking66 (Wexford) - Posts: 12086 - 01/02/2023 16:18:00    2455832

Link

Replying To Viking66:  "We are coaching the kids to use their 4 steps before hopping or soloing the ball."
That makes sense in most scenarios, but if a tackler is about to meet you within around 4 steps, you're better off soloing just before you get close to him, so you have your steps free when he's ready to tackle.
Not having to play the ball at that stage helps the player to retain it. At worst he'll have to hop it, which is still better than soloing while being tackled.

WanPintWin (Galway) - Posts: 2050 - 01/02/2023 16:46:45    2455840

Link

Replying To WanPintWin:  "That makes sense in most scenarios, but if a tackler is about to meet you within around 4 steps, you're better off soloing just before you get close to him, so you have your steps free when he's ready to tackle.
Not having to play the ball at that stage helps the player to retain it. At worst he'll have to hop it, which is still better than soloing while being tackled."
Yes for sure. It's like when you are teaching them to tackle you tell them not to jump in for the tackle until the ball carrier has taken 2 or 3 steps. The OP made the point lads used to hop the ball straight away when they received it. Our lads at u9 and some still at u11 did this when there was noone near them!

Viking66 (Wexford) - Posts: 12086 - 01/02/2023 17:35:12    2455852

Link

Replying To WanPintWin:  "The ironic thing is that you're far more likely to be done for overcarrying when not taking any steps at all.
We see all the time a lad with the ball gets bottled up, he has the ball for about 2 seconds while taking no steps and the ref blows a free against him, just as he gets the ball away.
With steps, players will get away with more if they're in the process of fending off an attempted tackle. The steps taken during the tussle seem to be not counted regularly."
Your last observation is precisely the problem.

Forwards are allowed carry a ball illegally out of the attempted tackle 'to make space for the shot'. What chance has a defender one-on-one as a result? The only sensible remedy is to mass your players in defensive positions within 50m of your goal. The thrown hand pass, while seemingly innocuous, adds to the problem because the pass is easier to control. Less of a contest for possession as a result.

Its not a criticism of referees by the way, more an indictment of players, mentors and supporters. We all call for the rules to be applied correctly and consistently, but don't want the steps rule imposed on our star corner forward!

As far as overcarrying while not moving, there is provision for the time taken to take 4 steps in the laws of the game. An odd construction of a rule but its there all the same.

What to do? I'd make it.
5 steps and strictly max 5
First action must be a solo not a hop
3 seconds stationary- release ball or free kick
No open hand for pass. Definite striking action with closed fist and static holding arm.
No score from fist out of own hand inside 13m
No score from ball in flight from handpass I.e. floated handpass

The game seriously needs to create opportunities for defenders to turn the ball over one-on-one or we will be stuck with interminable handfasting for good.

Eddie the Exile (Monaghan) - Posts: 1064 - 01/02/2023 18:28:50    2455859

Link

Replying To gunman:  "I see a new thing this last couple of years.When a player received a ball they used to take a hop or a solo but now a lot of them make an initial fast burst often taking a lot of steps."
The best way of getting a bit of distance is as you say, your quota of steps first and then a good long hop of ball. Ways to get the max steps is as your hopping the ball is to start your bounce from shoulder height.

Saynothing (Tyrone) - Posts: 2017 - 01/02/2023 18:32:50    2455861

Link

Replying To Eddie the Exile:  "The liberal interpretation of two basic rules of Gaelic football is back for 2023. It's a near certainty that a forward with a sniff of a chance can go 7 or 8 steps past he man marker to get a shot away. And sure why bother striking a hand-pass when a throw is much safer?

Last weekend alone (and not an exhaustive list):
James Carr 7 or 8 steps for his goal for Mayo- but sure wasn't it a great shot all the same
P McBrearty- threw the hand pass to set up his winner, again a super finish
O'Sullivan threw Kerry's last point over the bar after about 8 steps- the classic 2-hander Kerry way
Shane Walsh took a mere 7 steps to get round the Cork corner back for Meath's opening goal
And Clare's winner against Louth was straight from a clean lift off the ground.

Would any of the referee's involved have made it out of the car park if they'd applied the law correctly? Sorting out these two would do much to sort out the scourge of packed defences"
McBrearty clearly handpassed that ball. I agree its creeping into the game but you couldnt get a more obvious handpass than that one.

tiobraid (Tipperary) - Posts: 4119 - 02/02/2023 09:08:23    2455893

Link