(Oldest Posts First) - Go To The Latest Post
|
Saw that and thought the exact same thing.. if Glen had won in those circumstances I very much doubt he would going after Kilmacud. Glen only pointing out the GAA's inexplicable inaction which arose from Kilmacud's mistake.
Donegal_abroad (Donegal) - Posts: 1407 - 28/01/2023 15:36:17 2454754 Link 3 |
|
Well that is the stupidest comment yet on this issue
Thejampot (Leitrim) - Posts: 354 - 28/01/2023 16:26:30 2454766 Link 3 |
|
No head count needed,ref and linesman just make sure player being replaced actually leaves the field of play..ref adds time for all subs,might stop the stupidity of fellas being brought on in the final minute or two of matches..watched the dubs/Kildare,never before did I see where substitutions were watched so carefully..looks like the mistake from last week has made a huge difference already..let's hope now that those rules will be implemented for every match.. CTGAA10 (Limerick) - Posts: 2508 - 28/01/2023 18:40:03 2454786 Link 2 |
|
The referee in the Mayo v Dublin got it wrong. Mayo had 16 men on the field in violation of the rule. The play should have continued with a kick-out taken as the ball had gone wide. If the ball had not gone wide Dublin should have been awarded a free kick when the infraction was brought to the referee's attention. If a score resulted while the scoring team had 16 players on the pitch then the score should be disallowed and a free out awarded. Gaa Fan (USA) - Posts: 763 - 28/01/2023 19:10:23 2454791 Link 1 |
|
So why didn't Dublin contest the game?
SimonstownBack (Meath) - Posts: 163 - 28/01/2023 19:58:20 2454797 Link 0 |
|
Just after watching the clip of that game. The referee let mayo retake the 45 because McMahon walked across the ball before the 45 was taken. Philly obviously choose to forget about this going by his article in today's paper Thejampot (Leitrim) - Posts: 354 - 28/01/2023 20:00:17 2454798 Link 2 |
|
Too much class, and were also probably notified privately that the game was over, move on. As for the post regarding McMahon walking across the field this is a cop out. The referee allowed the play to continue, and a free to be taken, with 16 Mayo men on the field. He should not have allowed play to continue until McMahon left the pitch and obviously was unaware that too many players were on the field. When he was made aware that Mayo had too many players on the pitch Dublin should have been awarded a free kick. Personally I feel errors by made by officials, EXCLUDING announcing/reporting the incorrect score, during a game, if not corrected IMMEDIATELY, cannot and should not be corrected later. Gaa Fan (USA) - Posts: 763 - 28/01/2023 20:30:57 2454805 Link 2 |
|
Would that include the Shane Walsh point awarded (and rightly so ) at hall time ?
Saynothing (Tyrone) - Posts: 2291 - 28/01/2023 20:53:49 2454811 Link 0 |
|
Or just one simple question. What happens the next time when the 16th man dives and stops the ball from going into the net ? Now do we want a new rule there is no infringement as long as the 16th man does nor interfere with play. ABSURD.
Canuck (Waterford) - Posts: 3039 - 28/01/2023 20:56:12 2454812 Link 0 |
|
Real unbiased stuff from the eloquent McMahon....
totalrecall (Leitrim) - Posts: 1056 - 28/01/2023 20:58:36 2454814 Link 0 |
|
Interesting point there about not correcting errors made during the game. Might help to include that in the rules, like in other sports: Soccer, Law 5.2: [...] The referee may not change a restart decision on realising that it is incorrect or on the advice of another match official if play has restarted or the referee has signalled the end of the first or second half (including extra time) and left the field of play or abandoned the match. [Followed by the exception for a review, i.e. VAR.] Snooker, Section 3, Rule 7(c): If a stroke is made with a ball or balls not correctly spotted, they shall be considered correctly spotted for subsequent strokes. Any colour incorrectly missing from the table shall be spotted: (i) without penalty when discovered if missing due to previous oversight, provided the frame has not already ended under the terms of Section 2 Rule 1 and play shall continue from the resulting position; or (ii) subject to penalty if the striker played before the referee was able to complete the spotting. So if a mistake was made, meh, get over it. That ship has sailed. Tacaí Liatroma (Leitrim) - Posts: 1173 - 28/01/2023 20:59:48 2454816 Link 0 |
|
The referee may not change a restart decision on realising that it is incorrect or on the advice of another match official if play has restarted or the referee has signalled the end of the first or second half (including extra time) and left the field of play or abandoned the match. [Followed by the exception for a review, i.e. VAR.] Snooker, Section 3, Rule 7(c): If a stroke is made with a ball or balls not correctly spotted, they shall be considered correctly spotted for subsequent strokes. Any colour incorrectly missing from the table shall be spotted: (i) without penalty when discovered if missing due to previous oversight, provided the frame has not already ended under the terms of Section 2 Rule 1 and play shall continue from the resulting position; or (ii) subject to penalty if the striker played before the referee was able to complete the spotting. So if a mistake was made, meh, get over it. That ship has sailed."]I agree. Mistakes are made by officials in all sports, fouls and ones that should have resulted in penalties, are missed. You cannot award a free for an incident prior to (in GAA games) the current possession. Gaa Fan (USA) - Posts: 763 - 28/01/2023 21:14:34 2454821 Link 1 |
|
Apparently the CCCC will "hold a hearing with both clubs in an effort to find a resolution to the ongoing saga". Croke Park running away from making a decision. For Gods sake make the decision and move on. IsMise (Tyrone) - Posts: 119 - 28/01/2023 21:37:48 2454832 Link 1 |
|
Perhaps if they bring the clubs together there might be a sensible solution. One that reflects the feelings of both rather than driven by click bait hysteria and rants from the sidelines,
BarneyGrant (Dublin) - Posts: 3520 - 29/01/2023 10:01:18 2454863 Link 2 |
|
Same reason most teams don't object to results even where there has been an incident or mistake that may have affected the result. They took it on chin and moved on.
BarneyGrant (Dublin) - Posts: 3520 - 29/01/2023 10:03:53 2454864 Link 1 |
|
Hope we have a sensible outcome and whatevervdecisiin is made bith teams accept it and move on. I'm sure many of us here remember the bizarre league quarter final or semi final in 1987 between Cork and Dublin. Game ended in a draw and Cork wanted repay. Gaa ordered extra time. Cork headed off to the train and Dublin went on the field CiarraiMick (Dublin) - Posts: 3913 - 29/01/2023 12:10:49 2454900 Link 1 |
|
Was at that! Strange ending to the game. Often wondered what would have happened had Barney missed the goal :-)
BarneyGrant (Dublin) - Posts: 3520 - 29/01/2023 12:15:53 2454903 Link 0 |
|
That game bears no relation to this one Mick.
Greengrass (Louth) - Posts: 6178 - 29/01/2023 12:21:38 2454908 Link 0 |
|
A sensible solution from the GAA! That would be something! It's usually a copout, probably a KC fine on this occasion and no admittance of responsibility on the part of the officials. A situation that could have been easily remedied on the day has become a total mess and no matter the outcome neither club will be happy with it.
baire (Galway) - Posts: 1849 - 29/01/2023 12:50:43 2454914 Link 0 |
|
They'll hear both sides and make a decision. What happens after that decision is made will be interesting.
Greengrass (Louth) - Posts: 6178 - 29/01/2023 13:02:27 2454919 Link 0 |