(Oldest Posts First) - Go To The Latest Post
Why does it have to depend in Glen lodging a complaint, a rule has clearly been broken, the GAA should deal with it. Galwayspur (Offaly) - Posts: 233 - 23/01/2023 08:13:07 2453515 Link 0 |
A decision given by the ref. So it had to have something to do with the ref, no?
oneoff (UK) - Posts: 1651 - 23/01/2023 08:50:35 2453517 Link 0 |
I'm surprised you were actually watching it. Considering you're normally outraged by things in games you've actually not watched.
oneoff (UK) - Posts: 1651 - 23/01/2023 08:53:22 2453519 Link 0 |
https://twitter.com/SmallerFishGAA/status/1617206760036614144?s=20&t=BC28qdxoM9Cq1G6ZTDsjDA BlastCalyle (Mayo) - Posts: 216 - 23/01/2023 09:21:36 2453522 Link 1 |
This is a difficult one, as our Meath poster said there has been precedents, Armagh played Laois in the championship first round , Laois deserved to win , but a mistake by the sideline official and Laois resulted in an extra man. Armagh didn't protest but CCCC issued a replay , back in Portlaoise and Laois won again. cuchulainn35 (Armagh) - Posts: 1691 - 23/01/2023 09:42:32 2453525 Link 0 |
People ought to really read what they think they are responding to. I said it would depend on them lodging an appeal IF the officials/Croke Park do not accept that a rule was broken. Seems it may have been so I assume there will be some action taken. Not clear at all what happened from the available footage - but I'm sure the relevant authorities will have that as well as all of the reports from the referee and other officials on the day. Typical of the interweb of course, this has rapidly descended into a pile on against Crokes who had nothing to do with any officiating error, and Dublin in general - just as it was Tyrone last week when every man who ever kicked a ball was being held partly morally responsible for one player's foul on David Clifford :-) BarneyGrant (Dublin) - Posts: 3688 - 23/01/2023 09:53:14 2453535 Link 0 |
the 16 man thing is a problem for the GAA. suckvalleypaddy (Galway) - Posts: 1763 - 23/01/2023 09:56:20 2453536 Link 3 |
16 men on the pitch and that extra man was active on blocking the goal line. It's black and white surely? The game must be replayed or Kilmacud should forfeit it. It looks however that Croke Park will run for cover as usual and leave Glen to chase it up. Ulsterman (Antrim) - Posts: 9837 - 23/01/2023 10:08:24 2453541 Link 2 |
thelongridge (Offaly) - Posts: 1879 - 23/01/2023 10:17:46 2453545 Link 0 |
I don't see many on HS piling in on Crokes or Dublin. I get the impression if it was down to the Glen players and management they would let it go but if there's a precedent that's been set in previous games that's different. Then Glen would be obliged to ask for clarification. It's only fair.
Ulsterman (Antrim) - Posts: 9837 - 23/01/2023 10:20:30 2453548 Link 1 |
It all depends on what the referee puts into his report. When the CCCC sees the report they can act on it if it is mentioned. If not then if Glen lodges an objection, the CCCC will investigate. CCCC(GAA)'s hands are tied if there is no reference to it in the referee's report. Jack L (None) - Posts: 3187 - 23/01/2023 10:26:53 2453550 Link 1 |
This is a difficult one, as our Meath poster said there has been precedents, Armagh played Laois in the championship first round , Laois deserved to win , but a mistake by the sideline official and Laois resulted in an extra man. Armagh didn't protest but CCCC issued a replay , back in Portlaoise and Laois won again. cuchulainn35 (Armagh) - Posts: 1691 - 23/01/2023 10:29:48 2453552 Link 0 |
Nothing to do with Crokes? A substitute should not enter the field of play until the player they are replacing has left the field.
Cockney_Cat (UK) - Posts: 2866 - 23/01/2023 11:02:41 2453570 Link 1 |
HS is moderated so you don't get that. I'm referring to Twitter mainly. It's not fault of either club. although I certainly accept the fact that teams as a matter of course now use late and meaningless substitutions to delay play, Of course Glen won't want to win or even draw in the committee room and it ought not be up to them to appeal which would make them look like bad losers. Nor are Crokes obligated to offer a replay as it was an official who was at fault, it would seem, but none of us know if we are going by what was shown on TG4. It's a mess surely. Pity as it was a good game played in a tough but sporting manner. BarneyGrant (Dublin) - Posts: 3688 - 23/01/2023 11:04:03 2453571 Link 0 |
And it isn't the Crokes management teams fault at all?
Viking66 (Wexford) - Posts: 16767 - 23/01/2023 11:04:19 2453572 Link 2 |
I would agree they are at fault too. As some one who has been on the line for yrs , you always make sure the man comes off when you are replacing them. I have seen many acts of sculdugary on the line … did Crokes jump up and down when the had the extra player on - no they didn't - cuchulainn35 (Armagh) - Posts: 1691 - 23/01/2023 11:35:24 2453582 Link 2 |
This post didn't go your way ulsterman did it ? a large majority of HS posters didn't agree with your opinion maybe because they're knowledgeable and fair football people who know the rules of the game and don't go in for your constant anti Southern bias particularly when it comes to anything Dublin related.
DUBJOHN (Dublin) - Posts: 943 - 23/01/2023 11:36:50 2453583 Link 1 |
It's funny how you always try and pretend you're not pushing your usual agenda and I'll always jump straight back to it within a few posts.
oneoff (UK) - Posts: 1651 - 23/01/2023 11:43:10 2453587 Link 0 |
I would agree with your post. I don't respond to the hot air from other "contributors" some of whom I doubt have any connection to the GAA whatsoever. There's a few trolls on HS.
Ulsterman (Antrim) - Posts: 9837 - 23/01/2023 11:48:59 2453589 Link 0 |
At the end of the day, Kilmacud had 16 players on the field defending the last play - clearly against the rules. 17 if you count Paul Mannion, I know he wasn't interfering or involved - but the other player was. hyperache (Meath) - Posts: 273 - 23/01/2023 11:53:13 2453590 Link 3 |