(Oldest Posts First) - Go To The Latest Post
|
Absolutely my point others here unfortunately cannot grasp the problem flaw in Hawkeye.
arock (Dublin) - Posts: 4896 - 29/07/2019 16:35:31 2218318 Link 0 |
|
Did you actually watch the incident? The ball was caught in play, i.e. the game never stopped! Hawkeye was not "deployed" by anyone on the field, neither umpire or ref because they did not see it go over the bar. As play unfolded 20 seconds later, the hawkeye official in the stand contacted the ref and said that last shot was a point, bring it back and restart the play. Hawkeye checks every shot in the background in case there is a mistake as there was yesterday. It does not need to be signaled by the umpire. There have been many instances where umpires have made a wide or point decision for hawkeye to interfere and correct it. Relatively straight forward sequence of play that you are not understanding. Had it been waved wide and there was a restart then you would have a valid point but based on what actually happened I'm afraid it is you that is incorrect. Only comment I would make is the process of using hawkeye in general is too slow. Faithfull (Offaly) - Posts: 573 - 29/07/2019 17:15:59 2218344 Link 3 |
|
I was thinking the same thing myself. My guess is the red card would stand.
Coopers_Helmet (Tipperary) - Posts: 154 - 29/07/2019 17:16:50 2218345 Link 0 |
|
Wrong, wrong, wrong. The video monitors should be constantly monitoring play and don't know an error has occurred until reviewed. This may take several play backs why other officials are following play on other monitors. In ice hockey the video room will call down if they note that the puck crossed the goal line and was missed. Played is then stopped. The clock put back to the time of goal scored and game restarted. Anything happened in between does not count. (including scores) These guys are professionals and doing this for years and no one disagrees. 99.9% of the goals are called on the ice so this is not required to do often. There are lots of things that are not correct in hurling but this is not one of them. The technology worked properly and so did the process. Would it be right if Wexford lost the game by a score that was not called? Was it right that Waterford lost the game from a score that never was ? Canuck (Waterford) - Posts: 2658 - 29/07/2019 17:19:39 2218348 Link 1 |
|
Soccer does allow that to happen with VAR.
joeteor (Donegal) - Posts: 217 - 29/07/2019 17:20:27 2218349 Link 1 |
|
Dirty play or assault should be dealt with if it happened coming down the tunnel before the game started. Does not need play.
Canuck (Waterford) - Posts: 2658 - 29/07/2019 17:21:56 2218351 Link 0 |
|
Shambolic officiating by all involved but the right decision that the goal should not have stood when Hawkeye showed it was a Wexford point. Killarney.87 (Tipperary) - Posts: 2513 - 29/07/2019 17:25:51 2218356 Link 1 |
|
the same sort thing happened in the nations league uefa tournament last month i think it was portugal vs switzerland..switzerland player went down in an innocuouce way and portugal go up the other end get a blatant penalty and referee signals for a penalty only to be called back by VAR to check the original foul which resulted in a penalty for the suisse.. pidge (Cork) - Posts: 543 - 29/07/2019 18:36:31 2218380 Link 0 |
|
As somebody has already pointed out this is exactly what happens with VAR in soccer. "I am right and you are incorrect" Lol jonjon (Mayo) - Posts: 99 - 29/07/2019 18:48:20 2218384 Link 2 |
|
How is it a problem? Of course the red card would stand, u can get sent off when play is stopped, before or after a game. Ball didn't go out of play, everything about the decision was correct
achara (Monaghan) - Posts: 562 - 29/07/2019 20:04:54 2218425 Link 2 |