(Oldest Posts First)
just looking at this article on the main page s goldrick (Cavan) - Posts: 5518 - 18/11/2015 09:52:04 1808162 Link 0 |
The Blanket defence is the problem as it results in excessive handpassing get rid of that before doing anything else. uibhfhaili1986 (Offaly) - Posts: 1296 - 18/11/2015 11:24:17 1808202 Link 0 |
Do ye not think the referees have enough to do without counting hand passes? 90% are throw balls anyway not hand passes and the ref can't spot them. Now he's going to have to count them? The mark is a good idea if just used from kickouts . But what happens if a junior B goalkeeper can't kick it 45m against a strong wind? What happens then? Or is there different rules for club and county? Awwwwnow (Cavan) - Posts: 1050 - 18/11/2015 13:15:44 1808244 Link 0 |
what happens if a junior B goalkeeper can't kick it 45m against a strong wind? What happens then? shea (Kerry) - Posts: 409 - 18/11/2015 13:35:02 1808247 Link 0 |
So it doesn't stop the short kick out its only another option? Fair enough. But if it reaches the 45 and a player calls a mark then he going to have to kick it? He ain't going to like that is he? Kicking it..could he hand pass it? Because some of them county players are not great at kicking it! The more use to hand passing!!! Awwwwnow (Cavan) - Posts: 1050 - 18/11/2015 13:56:19 1808256 Link 0 |
Would like to see a rule implemented whereby if a player is tackled they must play the ball or lose it, a bit like in rugby. slayer (Limerick) - Posts: 6480 - 18/11/2015 14:57:39 1808282 Link 0 |
how about allowing a player who receives a hand-pass to be tackled ! crikey (Australia) - Posts: 355 - 22/11/2015 09:47:33 1808941 Link 0 |
Would like to see a rule implemented whereby if a player is tackled they must play the ball or lose it, a bit like in rugby. Whammo86 (Antrim) - Posts: 4217 - 22/11/2015 11:43:36 1808956 Link 0 |
Completely agree with Whammo96- we already have a clearly defined tackle in Gaelic football. The problem centres around inconsistency of referees, and poor catching. I do not want to see a game where skilful players are hauled to the ground- if people want that, go watch rugby instead. football first (None) - Posts: 1259 - 22/11/2015 12:10:11 1808960 Link 0 |
I agree with the lads above re the tackle, gaa is primarily an evasion game and has clearly defined tackles. I would like to see a mark for long kick outs caught above head height but wouldn't like to outlaw the short kick outs as to do so would just see the midfield completely flooded with players. lillyboy (Kildare) - Posts: 429 - 22/11/2015 19:23:51 1809067 Link 0 |
But then you could say that the reason the tackle is under pressure is down to guys being allowed to over-carry the ball and generally foul the guy trying to tackle them. TheMaster (Mayo) - Posts: 16187 - 23/11/2015 13:08:28 1809231 Link 0 |
We have that rule already. You have to hop or bounce the ball including when you're being tackled. I don't see what other rule you'd like to be implemented without turning the game into rugby or worse tag rugby. Also the man isn't supposed to be tackled, the ball is. A good defender flicks the ball away when his man is soloing or executes a block. I don't want this skills removed so that guys can wrestle others to the ground . slayer (Limerick) - Posts: 6480 - 23/11/2015 15:03:34 1809267 Link 0 |
I agree with the lads above re the tackle, gaa is primarily an evasion game and has clearly defined tackles. slayer (Limerick) - Posts: 6480 - 23/11/2015 15:11:08 1809273 Link 0 |
Make the two man tackle a foul (and enforce it also) and you will have cleaned up the game and eliminated the blanket defence (no point having extra defenders if they can't swarm around a player) tirawleybaron (Mayo) - Posts: 1106 - 23/11/2015 17:47:04 1809318 Link 0 |
Clearest solution - adopt the AFL rule, which also used in the IRS - 'If a player is tackled without releasing the ball, the tackler gets the free'. There is a real incentive here to keep the ball moving. omahant (USA) - Posts: 2581 - 24/11/2015 21:12:37 1809659 Link 0 |
Tackle is a skill by which a player may dispossess an opponent or frustrate his objective within the Rules of Fair Play. The tackle is aimed at the ball, not the player. The tackler may use his body to confront the opponent but deliberate bodily contact (such as punching, slapping, arm holding, pushing, tripping, jersey pulling or a full frontal charge) is forbidden. The only deliberate physical contact can be a Fair Charge i.e. Shoulder-to-shoulder with at least one foot on the ground. More than one player can tackle the player in possession. elvistheking (Galway) - Posts: 99 - 24/11/2015 21:59:49 1809666 Link 0 |
I don't agree with those who would favour an aussie rules type tackle whereby a tackled player has to release the ball. then that changes the whole game. to me it doesn't take much football skill to throw your arms around a player and haul him to the ground. it's a skill allright but not a football skill. We have a tackle that is legal but more often than not illegal tackles are not punished and the refs can't wait to give a free against the man in possesion for over-carrying even though he is actually being physically restrained. there is nothing in the rules that says you can hold on to a man . you must tackle the ball. so why do referees not punish these Man on Man tackles., or sometimes 2 ,3,4 men on man tackles. s goldrick (Cavan) - Posts: 5518 - 25/11/2015 21:52:18 1809947 Link 0 |